WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

H 2836

An Act relative to Parkinson's disease disability and death in firefighters

194th Legislature (2025-2026) Introduced by Jim Arciero and 54 co-sponsors

Establishes Parkinson's disease as presumptive occupational illness for Massachusetts firefighters, automatically qualifying them for workers' compensation benefits without proving work-causation.

Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on House Ways and Means
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · H 2836

Legislative bill overview

H 2836 establishes Parkinson's disease as a presumptive occupational illness for Massachusetts firefighters, meaning firefighters diagnosed with Parkinson's would be presumed to have contracted it through their work without requiring individual proof of causation. The bill would make firefighters with Parkinson's eligible for workers' compensation benefits and related disability or death benefits for their families.

Why is this important

Firefighters are exposed to numerous hazardous substances during their careers, including volatile chemicals, pesticides, and metals that some research suggests may increase Parkinson's risk. Presumptive illness laws reduce the burden on firefighters to prove their condition is work-related, which can be medically and legally difficult. This affects both individual firefighters seeking benefits and the broader workers' compensation system's costs.

Potential points of contention

  • Scientific causation debate: While some studies suggest occupational exposure correlates with Parkinson's in firefighters, the medical and scientific community hasn't reached complete consensus on direct causation, which opponents may cite to question the presumption's basis.
  • Workers' compensation cost impact: Expanding presumptive illnesses increases workers' compensation insurance costs for municipalities and the state, potentially affecting public budgets already facing fiscal pressure.
  • Scope and precedent: Establishing Parkinson's as presumptive may invite similar requests from other occupational groups or for other conditions, raising questions about where to draw the line on occupational disease presumptions.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.