WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

H 936

An act relating to providing an oath option in affirmation requirements throughout the Vermont Statutes Annotated

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Tom Burditt and 1 co-sponsor

Vermont bill authorizes oath and affirmation options throughout state law to accommodate diverse religious and secular conscience-based preferences in legal proceedings.

Read first time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · H 936

Legislative bill overview

H 936 amends Vermont statutes to allow individuals to take an oath as an alternative to making an affirmation in legal proceedings and official matters. Currently, Vermont law permits affirmations (solemn promises without religious invocation) as a substitute for oaths, but this bill would ensure both options are explicitly available throughout state law.

Why is this important

This addresses religious freedom and conscience protections by giving people a choice between oath-taking (which may invoke God or religious concepts) and secular affirmations. For some individuals, religious conviction requires oath-taking; for others, secular affirmations align better with their beliefs. The change clarifies procedural rights across multiple legal contexts where testimony or official declarations are required.

Potential points of contention

  • Religious vs. secular balance: Some may view the emphasis on oath options as favoring religious practitioners, while others see expanded affirmation language as already adequate
  • Implementation scope: Questions about which specific Vermont statutes need revision and whether current language already permits both options in practice
  • Judicial consistency: Concerns about whether different courts or officials might interpret oath/affirmation requirements differently without clear statutory guidance

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.