WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 102

AN ACT relating to misconduct in schools and at school-sponsored activities.

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Emily Callaway and 2 co-sponsors

HB 102 defines and enforces misconduct in school settings and at school-sponsored activities, outlining prohibited acts, reporting, discipline, and accountability for students, sta

to Primary and Secondary Education (H)
#backgroundchecks #boardsandcommissions #education #elementaryandsecondary #stateagencies #teachers
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 102

HB 102 (2026RS) – Misconduct in Schools and at School-Sponsored Activities (Kentucky)

Purpose and intent

  • The bill addresses misconduct occurring within public schools and at activities sponsored or endorsed by schools. It is intended to establish definitions, conduct standards, and enforcement mechanisms to respond to inappropriate or unlawful behavior by students, school employees, volunteers, and others involved in school-sponsored events.

Key provisions and changes (proposed)

  • Definitions: Establishes formal definitions for terms related to misconduct in school settings and at school-sponsored activities. This may include categories such as disruptive behavior, harassment, violence, sexual misconduct, bullying, and other prohibited acts, as well as who is covered (students, school personnel, volunteers, contractors, etc.).
  • Prohibited conduct: Specifies behaviors deemed misconduct within the school environment and during school-sponsored events. This typically covers acts that threaten safety, disrupt learning, or violate school policies and state law.
  • Consequences and discipline:
    • Outlines possible disciplinary responses (e.g., warnings, suspensions, expulsions, referral to law enforcement, or other corrective actions) depending on the nature and severity of the misconduct.
    • May require administrators to follow due process procedures and offer avenues for appeal or review.
  • Reporting and documentation:
    • Establishes mandatory reporting requirements for certain offenses or incidents (e.g., threats, violence, or sexual misconduct).
    • Specifies record-keeping standards and timelines for filing incident reports and disciplinary actions.
  • School personnel responsibilities:
    • Defines duties of teachers, administrators, and school staff in recognizing, reporting, and addressing misconduct.
    • Addresses how to handle investigations, safety planning, and coordination with local law enforcement and child protection agencies.
  • Student and family protections:
    • May include provisions ensuring students’ rights to notice, hearing, and fair treatment.
    • Could set limits on disciplinary actions for protected students or require supports such as counseling or restorative practices in certain cases.
  • School-sponsored activities:
    • Extends the misconduct standards to off-campus or extra-curricular events if they are associated with the school, ensuring consistent accountability.
  • Enforcement and accountability:
    • Describes the roles of school boards, districts, and state agencies in enforcing the new rules and evaluating compliance.
    • May authorize audits, reporting requirements, or periodic reviews to assess effectiveness.

Who would be affected

  • Students: Subject to defined misconduct standards and corresponding disciplinary measures.
  • School personnel: Teachers, administrators, coaches, and staff with specified duties for reporting and responding to misconduct.
  • Volunteers and contractors: Individuals involved in school activities who may be bound by the new rules.
  • School districts and boards: Responsible for implementing procedures, training, and enforcing provisions, as well as reporting outcomes.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • The bill’s action history indicates:
    • Introduction in the Kentucky House on January 7, 2026.
    • Referral to the Committee on Committees (H) on January 7, 2026, and subsequently to the Primary and Secondary Education committee on January 14, 2026.
  • While exact timelines for implementation (e.g., effective dates, phased rollout, rulemaking) are not specified here, typical next steps would include committee hearings, potential amendments, floor votes, and, if enacted, a defined effective date for compliance by school districts.

Notes

  • The summary above reflects the bill’s stated aims and common structural elements of similar misconduct legislation. The final text would provide precise definitions, specific offenses, disciplinary pathways, reporting requirements, funding implications, and any due-process protections or exemptions.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.