WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 470

An Act providing for meal breaks or rest periods for employees; and imposing penalties.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Missy Cerrato and 16 co-sponsors

HB 470 bars state/local officers from enforcing or aiding in federal gun laws, orders, or actions, asserting anti-commandeering and limiting federal-state firearms cooperation.

Referred to Labor & Industry
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 470

HB 470 — “The Second Amendment Protection Act”

Status: Passed 1st Reading. Introduced: Nov. 12, 2024. Current posture: referred to committee; public hearing held March 12, 2025 (left pending).

Main purpose / intent

The bill declares a state-level protection of the right to keep and bear arms by prohibiting state and local public officers and employees from enforcing or assisting in the enforcement of certain federal firearms laws, orders, regulations, or policies that the General Assembly views as exceeding federal authority. It frames the measure as a Tenth‑Amendment/anti‑commandeering response intended to preserve state authority to regulate firearms within the State.

Key provisions

  • Findings: The preamble sets out legislative findings about federal limits under the U.S. Constitution (Tenth Amendment), and that many federal statutes, executive or administrative orders, rules, regulations, or other actions that restrict manufacture, possession, use, or sale of firearms or accessories within the State exceed federal power.
  • Definitions: The measure defines several terms used in the section, including:
    • “Law‑abiding citizen” (person not precluded under state law from possessing a firearm);
    • “Law enforcement officer”;
    • “Material aid or support” (lodging, communications, facilities, weapons, personnel, transport, clothing, or other physical assets — excluding medicine or assistance to avoid imminent life‑threatening injury);
    • “Public office,” “public officer,” and “political subdivision.”
  • Core prohibitions (proposed new statutory section, § 14‑409.44):
    • No public officer or employee of the State or political subdivision shall enforce, attempt to enforce, or participate in enforcement of federal acts, executive orders, administrative orders, rules, regulations, statutes, or ordinances regarding firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition.
    • Public officers/employees are prohibited from acceding to requests to provide “material aid or support” for the enforcement or implementation of such federal firearms actions.
  • Scope: Applies to state and local public officers, employees, and political subdivisions. (Text excerpt is truncated; full bill may contain additional operative language, exceptions, or penalties.)

Who would be affected

  • State and local law enforcement agencies and officers.
  • State and local public officials and agencies that currently cooperate with federal firearms enforcement or shared task forces.
  • Federal agencies seeking state assistance in firearms investigations/enforcement (may face reduced state cooperation).
  • Residents and businesses regulated by federal firearms law (enforcement practice at local level could change).

Potential impacts and legal considerations

  • Operational: Could curtail state/local participation in federal‑state task forces and information‑sharing related to federal firearms enforcement; may change enforcement priorities or intergovernmental coordination.
  • Fiscal: Not specified in the bill excerpt; possible indirect costs if federal grants or cooperative programs are affected.
  • Legal: The bill raises potential constitutional questions (interaction with the Supremacy Clause and federal authority). Prevailing U.S. Supreme Court precedent recognizes limits on federal commandeering of state officials (e.g., Printz v. United States), but other cooperation/refusal claims can prompt litigation. The bill does not (in the excerpt) prescribe criminal penalties or civil remedies for violations; enforcement mechanism may be internal or administrative unless other sections provide penalties.

Legislative timeline & procedural notes

  • Filed: Nov. 12, 2024.
  • Read first time (chamber): Feb.–Mar. 2025 (documented readings and committee referrals vary by source).
  • Public hearing / testimony taken: Mar. 12, 2025 (left pending in committee).
  • Current status reported by request: Passed 1st Reading and pending further committee action (House Committee on State Government / Rules depending on chamber schedule).

If you want, I can produce a side‑by‑side comparison of this bill’s text with current state law or summarize likely legal arguments for and against under federal constitutional doctrine.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.