WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 2534

An Act providing for artificial intelligence transparency, for duties of covered providers of generative artificial intelligence systems and for large online platforms and generative artificial intelligence system hosting platforms; and imposing a penalty.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Joe Ciresi and 7 co-sponsors

The bill requires transparency and disclosures for generative AI systems and platforms, holding providers and hosting platforms accountable with penalties for noncompliance.

Referred to Communications & Technology
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 2534

Summary of HB 2534 (Pennsylvania, 2025-2026)

Purpose and intent

HB 2534 is a Pennsylvania bill titled An Act providing for artificial intelligence transparency, for duties of covered providers of generative artificial intelligence systems and for large online platforms and generative artificial intelligence system hosting platforms; and imposing a penalty. The bill appears to introduce requirements related to transparency for artificial intelligence (AI) systems, establish duties for providers of generative AI and large online platforms, and create penalties for noncompliance. The exact policy goals are framed around transparency and accountability in the deployment and hosting of generative AI technologies.

Key provisions and changes

  • AI transparency framework (generative AI)

    • The bill sets out duties for covered providers of generative AI systems. While specific article-level details are not fully provided in the excerpt, the intent is to require disclosure or transparency related to how generative AI systems operate, such as data provenance, model capabilities/limitations, or decision-making processes.
    • Large online platforms and hosting platforms for generative AI systems would also face defined duties, likely including disclosure obligations, user guidance, and accountability measures for AI services hosted on their platforms.

  • Duties of covered providers

    • Providers of generative AI systems would be required to comply with the act’s transparency and accountability provisions. This may include informing users about AI usage, providing disclosures on how outputs are generated, and possibly addressing bias, safety, and risk considerations.

  • Penalties

    • The act includes penalties for noncompliance, though specific fine amounts or enforcement mechanisms are not detailed in the provided text. The presence of a penalty indicates a compliance-enforcement framework.

  • Licensing and costs (unrelated but present in text)

    • A subparagraph was added to § 2709 (License costs and fees) indicating a license issuance cost for certain activities, with a note mentioning “Law enforcement hunting - $1” as an example cost. This appears to be a small, possibly ceremonial or placeholder provision and may not be directly tied to AI provisions. Its exact relationship to AI duties is unclear from the excerpt.

  • Effective date

    • The act is stated to take effect 60 days after enactment.

Who would be affected

  • Covered providers of generative AI systems: Entities that develop and deploy generative AI technologies would have to comply with transparency and duty requirements.
  • Large online platforms and hosting platforms for generative AI: Platforms that host or facilitate access to generative AI systems would be subject to the act’s duties, including disclosures and potential user-facing information.
  • Potentially other stakeholders: Users of generative AI services, developers, researchers, and possibly advertisers or data providers could be indirectly affected through required disclosures and safety measures.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Status: As of the action history, the bill has been referred to the Communications & Technology committee.
  • Sponsor information: Notable co-sponsors include Jason Ortitay, Nikki Rivera, Tina Pickett, Ben Sanchez, Lindsay Powell, Joe Ciresi, Kristine Howard, and Arvind Venkat.
  • Effective date: 60 days after enactment.
  • The bill’s text indicates an amendment to license cost provisions in a different chapter (license costs and fees), which may reflect broader licensing or administrative modifications concurrent with AI transparency provisions.

Impact considerations

  • Public transparency: If enacted, users could gain clearer information about how generative AI systems operate and how outputs are produced.
  • Platform accountability: Large platforms hosting AI services may need to implement user disclosures, safety nets, and governance mechanisms to comply.
  • Compliance burden: Providers and platforms may incur additional administrative and technical requirements, including documentation, risk assessments, and potential audits.
  • Enforcement: Penalties would create an incentive for compliance, though the specific enforcement framework (agency, penalty amounts, remedy processes) is not described in the excerpt.

Additional notes

  • The provided text is partial and focuses on a licensing fee subsection and the act’s effective date. A full reading of the bill would be necessary to capture complete definitions (e.g., what constitutes a “covered provider,” specific disclosure requirements, scope of platforms, exemptions, and penalty structure).

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to a particular audience (e.g., policymakers, business owners, general public) or compare it to existing Pennsylvania AI-related statutes for context.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.