WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

H 1894

An Act promoting equity in traffic stops

194th Legislature (2025-2026) Introduced by Jamie Eldridge and 2 co-sponsors

The bill prohibits using evidence from traffic stops for unrelated crimes unless there was prior suspicion or probable cause, shifting burden to prosecutors in suppression rulings.

Accompanied a study order, see H5281 (under House Rule 27)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · H 1894

Summary: H 1894 — An Act promoting equity in traffic stops

Overview

H 1894 proposes a new provision (Section 20I) to Chapter 90 of the General Laws, intended to curb evidentiary use of information obtained during traffic stops that is unrelated to the stop’s traffic violation. The bill seeks to ensure that evidence introduced in criminal proceedings is tied to the traffic stop itself, with a framework that places the burden of proof on the Commonwealth to show prior criminal activity suspicion existed before the stop. The measure aims to reduce pretextual or opportunistic investigations arising from traffic stops and promote equity in policing practices.

Key Provisions

  • Section 20I(a) — Admissibility of evidence:

    • Evidence obtained during a traffic stop is inadmissible in a criminal proceeding if it is unrelated to the traffic violation that prompted the stop.
    • The prohibition does not apply if the officer had reasonable suspicion or probable cause before initiating the stop to believe the operator or passenger was engaged in a felony or misdemeanor.

  • Section 20I(b) — Burden of proof in suppression motions:

    • In any motion to suppress, the Commonwealth must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that reasonable suspicion or probable cause of criminal activity existed prior to the traffic stop.

  • Section 20I(c) — Law enforcement authority:

    • Officers may enforce traffic laws (issuance of citations, warnings, or arrests for traffic violations).
    • Enforcement must not serve as a pretext for investigating unrelated criminal activity.

  • Section 20I(d) — Remedies for violations:

    • Evidence obtained in violation of this section must be suppressed and is not admissible in Massachusetts courts.
    • Individuals subjected to a stop in violation may pursue civil remedies under state or federal law, including injunctive relief or monetary damages.

Who and What Is Affected

  • Affected actors:

    • Law enforcement officers conducting traffic stops (their investigative scope is narrowed).
    • Prosecutors and the Commonwealth (burden of proof shifts to establishing pre-stop suspicion).
    • Individuals stopped by police (greater protection against unrelated criminal investigations during stops).

  • Affected processes:

    • Criminal prosecutions involving stop-derived evidence.
    • Civil litigation stemming from unlawful traffic stops.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduced: February 27, 2025.
  • Committee status: Referred to the Judiciary; Senate concurrence indicated in the bill’s docket entries.
  • House docket: House No. 1894 (HD 3766 in related materials).
  • Hearing schedule: Currently scheduled for June 3, 2025, in Room A-2 (with listed times suggesting 1:00 PM to 9:00 PM; additional related hearing entries show 1:00 PM to 5:00 PM participation in earlier scheduling). The hearing is part of the 2025-2026 session (One Hundred Ninety-Fourth General Court).

Practical Implications

  • Strengthens protections against using traffic stops as opportunities to investigate unrelated crimes.
  • Creates a clearer evidentiary framework for suppressing stop-derived evidence that is not tied to the traffic violation.
  • Shifts the burden of proof to the Commonwealth in suppression rulings, requiring demonstration of prior suspicion or probable cause.
  • Maintains the police’s ability to enforce traffic laws, while prohibiting pretextual investigations.

This summary reflects the bill’s text proposing a new Section 20I within Chapter 90 and the accompanying procedural notes from the bill’s docket.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.