WeVote

Bill

Bill

H 127

An Act prohibiting the aquaculture of any species of octopus for the purpose of human consumption

194th Legislature (2025-2026) Introduced by Chris Hendricks and 1 co-sponsor

H 127 - An Act prohibiting the aquaculture of any species of octopus for the purpose of human consumption OverviewBill Number: H 127 Title: An Act prohibiting the aquaculture of a

Accompanied a new draft, see H4422
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · H 127

H 127 - An Act prohibiting the aquaculture of any species of octopus for the purpose of human consumption

Overview

Bill Number: H 127
Title: An Act prohibiting the aquaculture of any species of octopus for the purpose of human consumption
Status: Accompanied a new draft, see H4422
Introduced: February 04, 2025

Purpose and Intent

The primary goal of this bill is to ban the aquaculture, or commercial farming, of octopus for human consumption. The legislation is motivated by concerns over the ethical treatment of octopuses, which are highly intelligent and sentient creatures. Proponents argue that octopus farming is inherently cruel and causes undue suffering, and that alternative sources of seafood should be prioritized.

Key Provisions

  • Prohibits any person, corporation, or other entity from engaging in the aquaculture of octopus for the purpose of human consumption
  • Defines "aquaculture" as the controlled cultivation and harvest of aquatic organisms
  • Specifies that the ban applies to all species of octopus, including but not limited to the common octopus (Octopus vulgaris)
  • Establishes civil penalties for violations, including fines of up to $50,000 per violation
  • Grants enforcement authority to the state's Department of Environmental Protection

Affected Parties and Impacts

This bill would primarily impact companies and individuals involved in the emerging octopus aquaculture industry. It would effectively shut down any existing or planned octopus farming operations within the state. Consumers who enjoy eating octopus may also be affected, as the legislation would limit the availability of domestically farmed octopus.

Proponents argue that the bill would have a positive impact on animal welfare and the environment, as it would prevent the industrialized farming of a highly intelligent species. However, opponents may contend that it could increase reliance on wild-caught octopus or imports, potentially shifting environmental impacts elsewhere.

Procedural and Timeline Considerations

H 127 was introduced in the state legislature on February 4, 2025 and has been accompanied by a new draft, H4422. The bill is currently under consideration by the relevant legislative committees and will need to pass both chambers of the legislature before being sent to the governor for signature or veto. If enacted, the law would take effect 90 days after passage.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.