WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

H 2179

An Act prohibiting employment discrimination based on the legal use of cannabis

194th Legislature (2025-2026) Introduced by Chynah Tyler

Prohibits firing or denying employment to people for legally using cannabis off the clock, with rules for pre-employment testing and safety-sensitive exceptions.

Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on House Steering, Policy and Scheduling
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · H 2179

Summary: H 2179 — An Act prohibiting employment discrimination based on the legal use of cannabis

A Massachusetts bill introduced by Rep. Chynah Tyler aims to prohibit employment discrimination based on the legal use of cannabis, including protections for qualifying patients (medical cannabis users). The bill has progressed through committee with favorable recommendations and is referred to the House Steering, Policy and Scheduling Committee.

Purpose and intent

  • Establish protections against employment discrimination for individuals who use cannabis legally, including medical cannabis patients.
  • Limit employers’ ability to penalize or disfavor prospective or current employees solely for cannabis use outside of employment hours or off the job, while balancing workplace safety and federal considerations.

Key provisions

1) Definitions (Section 1)

  • Marijuana: Broad definition covering all parts of the cannabis plant (growing or not), seeds, resin, and derivatives, including THC as defined in Chapter 94C.
  • Qualifying patient: As defined in the Massachusetts medical cannabis framework (Chapter 369, Acts of 2012).
  • Employer: Any business or government entity operating in Massachusetts and its municipalities.
  • Prospective employee: Any individual applying for employment.
  • Safety sensitive position: Roles where being impaired could cause serious harm or loss of life to self or others.

2) Pre-employment testing and testing conditions (Section 2)

  • Employers may test a prospective employee for marijuana only after a conditional job offer has been extended (unless required by law).
  • Employers may not directly or indirectly solicit or require marijuana testing as a condition of employment.
  • Exceptions and clarifications:
    • Does not affect policies on substances other than marijuana.
    • Does not require permitting or accommodating marijuana use in the workplace.
    • Does not interfere with federal employment contracts.
    • The prohibitions do not apply to safety-sensitive positions or where compliance would violate federal law/agreements.

3) Protections for qualifying patients (Section 3)

  • Employers may not take adverse employment actions (hiring, firing, penalties, non-promotion) solely because of an individual’s status as a qualifying patient, unless the patient used, possessed, or was impaired by marijuana at work or during work hours.
  • A qualifying patient who fails an employer drug test cannot have employment decisions based solely on the positive test unless there is reasonable suspicion of impairment at work/hours.
  • Safety-sensitive positions and federal-law conflicting scenarios remain excluded or limited as noted in Section 2.

Who is affected

  • Prospective and current employees in Massachusetts, particularly those who are qualifying patients.
  • Employers across private businesses and public entities, including municipal employers.
  • Safety-sensitive roles where impairment concerns are critical.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduced: February 27, 2025.
  • Initially referred to the Labor and Workforce Development Committee.
  • As of the latest available update, the bill was reported favorably by committee and referred to the House Steering, Policy and Scheduling Committee (date: November 3, 2025).
  • Related matter previously filed in a prior session (HD 620; similar provisions).

Potential impact and considerations

  • Could reduce barriers to employment for medical cannabis patients and others using cannabis legally off-duty.
  • Requires employers to modify pre-employment testing practices and may necessitate policy updates.
  • Maintains safety safeguards for critical roles and addresses potential conflicts with federal law and contracts.
  • Aligns with a broader movement to depersonalize off-duty cannabis use in employment decisions while preserving workplace safety.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.