WeVote

Bill

Bill

HD 3539

An Act known as "Drug Test Consent Bill" aka "Christina's Law"

194th Legislature (2025-2026) Introduced by Colleen Garry

Summary of HD 3539 - "Drug Test Consent Bill" ("Christina's Law") Bill OverviewHD 3539, known as the "Drug Test Consent Bill" or "Christina's Law", is a proposed piece of legislati

0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HD 3539

Summary of HD 3539 - "Drug Test Consent Bill" ("Christina's Law")

Bill Overview

HD 3539, known as the "Drug Test Consent Bill" or "Christina's Law", is a proposed piece of legislation introduced on November 29, 2025. The primary purpose of this bill is to establish new requirements for employers to obtain employee consent before conducting drug testing.

Key Provisions

The main components of HD 3539 include:

  1. Consent Requirement for Drug Testing: The bill mandates that employers must obtain written consent from employees before requiring them to undergo any form of drug or alcohol testing. Employers would not be permitted to take adverse action against an employee for refusing to consent to testing.

  2. Expansion of Privacy Protections: The legislation expands employee privacy rights by limiting the circumstances under which employers can require drug or alcohol testing. Testing would only be allowed in cases of reasonable suspicion of impairment, after a workplace accident, or as part of a regular medical examination.

  3. Penalties for Noncompliance: Employers who violate the consent requirements or retaliate against employees who refuse testing would face civil penalties of up to $10,000 per violation. Employees would also have the right to file a civil lawsuit for damages.

  4. Exemptions for Certain Professions: The bill provides exemptions allowing drug testing without consent for employees in safety-sensitive positions, such as commercial drivers, airline pilots, and healthcare workers with direct patient care responsibilities.

Potential Impact

If enacted, HD 3539 would significantly restrict the ability of employers to unilaterally require drug or alcohol testing of their workforce. This would likely have the greatest impact on industries with a history of widespread or routine testing, such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, and certain public sector jobs.

Supporters argue the bill would protect employee privacy and civil liberties, while opponents contend it could compromise workplace safety and productivity. The bill's fate remains uncertain as it works its way through the legislative process.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.