WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 371

AN ACT ESTABLISHING A PERSONAL FLOTATION DEVICE REQUIREMENT FOR CHILDREN UNDER THE AGE OF TWELVE WHILE ON PUBLIC DOCKS, WHARVES AND PIERS.

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Herron Gaston and 2 co-sponsors

Connecticut's SB 371 requires children under 12 to wear life jackets on public docks and piers, directly preventing drowning deaths in high-risk waterfront areas where enforceme...

FILE NO. 299
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 371

Legislative bill overview

SB 371 proposes mandatory personal flotation device (PFD) usage for children under 12 years old while on public docks, wharves, and piers in Connecticut. The bill establishes a safety requirement in waterfront areas accessible to the public, with enforcement implications for property operators and caregivers.

Why is this important

Drowning is a leading cause of unintentional injury death among children. This legislation directly addresses a specific high-risk scenario—children in close proximity to water on public structures—where PFD compliance could prevent fatal incidents. The bill targets a vulnerable population in controlled environments where safety standards are feasible to implement and monitor.

Potential points of contention

Enforcement and liability - Unclear who bears responsibility for compliance. Are dock operators liable for enforcement? Do caregivers face penalties? Ambiguity here creates legal and practical challenges.

Scope limitations - Restricting the requirement only to public docks may create inconsistent safety standards, as private marinas and residential docks remain unregulated despite similar drowning risks.

Practical implementation - The bill doesn't specify exemptions for disabled children, children with medical conditions, or scenarios where PFDs might be impractical (e.g., loading cargo with young supervision). Overly rigid requirements could face resistance.

Cost and accessibility - No provisions addressing who supplies PFDs or how this affects lower-income families' access to public waterfront areas.

Age threshold justification - The under-12 cutoff lacks clear evidence basis. Some water safety experts recommend broader age ranges for certain risk profiles.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.