WeVote

Bill

Bill

HD 6218

An Act directing the city of Boston Police Department to waive the maximum age requirement for police officers for Jorge Enriquez

194th Legislature (2025-2026) Introduced by Chris Worrell

The bill directs Boston to waive the maximum age limit only for Jorge Enriquez to qualify for police officer recruitment.

0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HD 6218

Summary of Bill HD 6218 (Massachusetts, 194th Session)

Purpose and intent

  • This bill directs the City of Boston Police Department (BPD) to waive the maximum age requirement for police officer recruitment specifically for Jorge Enriquez.
  • The measure appears targeted to an individual case rather than a general policy change applicable to all applicants.

Key provisions and changes

  • Requirement to waive age eligibility: The bill obligates the Boston Police Department to overlook the statutory or department-established maximum age limit for Jorge Enriquez in the police officer hiring process.
  • No broad policy shift: Based on the title and description, the waiver applies exclusively to this individual and does not establish a universal or ongoing policy for other applicants or cohorts.

Affected parties and scope

  • Primary beneficiary: Jorge Enriquez, who would be eligible for employment as a police officer despite not meeting the existing maximum age requirement.
  • Boston Police Department: Responsible for implementing the waiver in the recruitment and selection process for this individual.
  • General public and applicants: No broad changes to age eligibility rules for all applicants are indicated; the bill does not rename or reform general eligibility standards beyond this case.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Legislative status: As a House bill (HD 6218) in the 194th Massachusetts General Court, it would require passage by both chambers and signature by the Governor to become law.
  • Specific timeline: The provided information does not include effective dates or sunset provisions. If enacted, the waiver would typically take effect upon the measure’s effective date or as specified in the statute.
  • Administrative implementation: If enacted, the Boston Police Department would need to process the waiver through standard hiring procedures, ensuring compliance with any applicable civil service and nondiscrimination laws.

Notes and considerations

  • Accreditation and legality: Even with a targeted waiver, the bill would need to align with state civil service rules, equal protection standards, and any applicable Massachusetts statutes governing age limits for police recruitment.
  • Precedent and policy impact: As a targeted exemption, this bill does not establish a general policy change and may raise questions about consistency and fairness in recruitment rules unless specific justifications are provided.

If you’d like, I can add a brief comparison to current Massachusetts policing age requirements or outline potential legal considerations for targeted waivers.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.