AN ACT CONCERNING THE DIRECT SALES OF MOTOR VEHICLES.
HB 5645 would regulate direct-to-consumer car sales by manufacturers, setting showroom licensing and safeguarding dealer protections and consumer rights.
HB 5645 would regulate direct-to-consumer car sales by manufacturers, setting showroom licensing and safeguarding dealer protections and consumer rights.
Status: Referred to Joint Committee on Transportation (filed Mar 14, 2025).
Note: The bill text was not provided. This summary is based on the bill title and public legislative actions; where the bill’s text is unknown, I describe likely subject matter and the typical provisions and impacts such a bill would involve. Speculative sections are clearly marked.
HB 5645 is intended to address the regulation of "direct sales" of motor vehicles — i.e., situations where vehicle manufacturers (or their affiliates) sell new motor vehicles directly to consumers rather than through independent, franchised dealerships. The bill likely seeks to clarify, expand, or restrict the legal framework governing such direct manufacturer-to-consumer sales.
Because the actual bill language is not provided, below are commonly addressed elements in direct-sales legislation that HB 5645 may contain:
- Whether manufacturers may operate retail storefronts or showrooms and sell new vehicles directly to consumers within the state.
- Licensing and registration requirements for manufacturer-owned retail locations (dealer licenses, sales-tax registration, consumer disclosure requirements).
- Limits on the number of direct-sales outlets a manufacturer may operate and whether certain manufacturers (e.g., electric vehicle startups) are treated differently.
- Provisions on vehicle servicing, warranty repairs, and authorized service facilities (consumer protection and safety standards).
- Franchise law modifications or explicit carve-outs to existing franchise protections for independent dealers.
- Transitional/ grandfathering rules for existing franchise agreements and prohibition on termination or nonrenewal of franchises without cause.
- Local zoning and land-use considerations for manufacturer showrooms.
- Enforcement mechanisms, penalties, and the state agency (likely Department of Motor Vehicles or equivalent) responsible for oversight.
Current status: Reported favorably by committee and placed on the legislative calendar — next step is likely floor consideration by the chamber of introduction.
If you want, I can:
- Search for and summarize the full bill text and committee report (if you provide a source or allow me to look it up), or
- Produce a side-by-side list of likely provisions and their pros/cons for specific stakeholders (manufacturers, dealers, consumers).
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.