WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 49

AN ACT AUTHORIZING THE KILLING OF BLACK BEAR THAT INJURE OR KILL LIVESTOCK OR OTHER DOMESTIC ANIMALS.

2025 Regular Session

Connecticut bill would authorize killing black bears that damage livestock or pets, broadening legal lethal removal authority for wildlife managers and property owners.

REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Environment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 49

Legislative bill overview

SB 49 would authorize the killing of black bears that injure or kill livestock or other domestic animals in Connecticut. The bill creates a legal mechanism for property owners or wildlife officials to lethally remove bears that pose direct threats to farm animals and domestic pets. This represents a shift from current wildlife management protocols that may restrict such lethal removal.

Why is this important

Black bear populations in Connecticut have grown significantly, leading to increased human-wildlife conflict, particularly in rural and suburban areas where bears raid farms and attack pets. Current state law may limit when bears can be legally killed, creating frustration among farmers and property owners who experience livestock losses. The bill attempts to balance wildlife conservation with landowner protection by establishing clearer authorization for lethal removal in specific damage scenarios.

Potential points of contention

  • Scope of authorization: Whether "injury" alone (without death) is sufficient justification for killing, potentially lowering the threshold compared to current law
  • Implementation details: Uncertainty about who can kill bears (property owners vs. licensed hunters only), what documentation is required, and whether it applies to all domestic animals or only livestock
  • Conservation impact: Whether increased lethal removal could affect black bear population sustainability in the state, particularly if bears are expanding from limited habitat
  • Alternative solutions: Debate over whether this addresses root causes (poor farm security, bear attractants) versus treating the symptom through culling

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.