WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 955

An Act amending Title 75 (Vehicles) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in size, weight and load, further providing for authority to issue permits.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Kerry Benninghoff and 6 co-sponsors

North Carolina would require clear total price disclosure including mandatory fees for covered services, ban deceptive or excessive fees, and cap early termination charges.

Referred to Transportation
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 955

HB 955 — "NC Junk Fee Prevention Act" — Summary

Status and procedural posture
- Bill: H.B. 955 (North Carolina, 2025 session) — titled the North Carolina Junk Fee Prevention Act.
- Introduced: (filed) Nov. 12, 2024. Status (per materials provided): Passed 1st Reading (April 2025) and referred to rules.
- Sponsor: Representative Longest.

Purpose and intent
- Establish statewide consumer protections against undisclosed, excessive, or deceptive mandatory fees (commonly called "junk fees"), require clear price transparency in advertising and ticket listings, and restrict certain early-termination charges for specified services.

Key provisions — new Article (Chapter 66, Article 52)
1. Definitions
- Consumer: an individual residing in or traveling in North Carolina.
- Covered entity: at minimum, providers or advertisers of short-term lodging (occupancy < 6 months); the Attorney General may add other entities.
- Covered services: internet; voice service; commercial mobile service; commercial mobile data; multichannel video programming distributor services (MVPD); and bundles including those services.
- Mandatory fee: any fee/surcharge a consumer must pay to purchase an advertised good or service, a fee not reasonably avoidable, or a fee a reasonable consumer would not expect; the AG may further define.

  1. Price transparency and fee disclosure (§ 66‑513)

    • Every covered entity must clearly and conspicuously display the total price (including all mandatory fees) in each advertisement and wherever a price is first shown.
    • The total amount of mandatory fees must not increase during the purchase process.
    • Covered entities may not impose or advertise mandatory fees that are excessive or deceptive.
    • Refunds/guarantees must be disclosed before transaction completion; refunds, when made, must return the total paid (including mandatory fees).

  2. Covered service protections (§ 66‑514)

    • Providers of covered services may not charge fees or impose unreasonable/excessive requirements for early termination of service, except they may charge for: (a) rental/loan equipment not returned within a reasonable period; and (b) outstanding costs of a purchased device.

  3. Enforcement and remedies (§ 66‑515)

    • Attorney General (AG) may adopt implementing rules and enforce the Article.
    • Civil penalties up to $5,000 per violation; proceeds go to the Civil Penalty and Forfeiture Fund. AG may seek cease-and-desist orders or other relief.
    • When assessing whether a fee is "excessive," the AG must consider factors such as proportionality to the provider’s cost and the reason for the fee.
    • A violation is treated as an unfair or deceptive trade practice under existing state law (G.S. 75‑1.1).

Amendment to ticket price transparency (G.S. 75‑44)
- Secondary ticket exchanges, ticket issuers, and resellers must clearly and conspicuously disclose the total ticket price (including mandatory fees and any maximum order-processing fee) whenever price is shown.
- The total ticket price displayed at the start of a ticketing session may not increase during that session except for specified charges (e.g., actual non-electronic delivery charges, government taxes/fees, and a reasonable processing fee).
- Mandatory fee descriptors must not be deceptive; the actual dollar amounts must be disclosed prior to purchase.

Who is affected
- Consumers: greater upfront price visibility and protections against surprise mandatory fees and certain early-termination charges.
- Businesses: short-term lodging providers (hotels, vacation rentals), ISPs, telecom and mobile service providers, MVPDs, ticket issuers and resale platforms, and other entities the AG may include — will need to change advertising, checkout flows, contract terms, refund practices, and compliance procedures.
- State enforcement: expanded role for the Attorney General to adopt rules, investigate, and enforce penalties.

Potential impacts and considerations
- Consumer benefit: increased price transparency and potential reduction in surprise or hidden fees.
- Business compliance costs: updates to advertising materials, websites, point-of-sale systems, contractual terms, and staff training; possible exposure to civil penalties and private litigation under unfair/deceptive trade practices law.
- State fiscal/administrative: enforcement could increase AG workload; penalty receipts directed to the Civil Penalty and Forfeiture Fund. No explicit fiscal note provided in the bill text.

Notes
- The bill gives the Attorney General discretion to identify additional covered entities and fees and to adopt implementing rules, which will shape scope and enforcement.
- The text treats violations as unfair/deceptive trade practices, potentially enabling private actions under existing consumer protection statutes.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.