WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 2628

An Act amending Title 75 (Vehicles) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in general provisions relating to operation of vehicles, providing for mobile work zone safety enforcement systems in lane-restricted work zones; and imposing penalties.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Josh Kail and 5 co-sponsors

The bill allows mobile work zone safety enforcement systems in lane-restricted work zones to monitor and penalize traffic violations, improving worker protection and compliance.

Referred to Transportation
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 2628

Overview

HB 2628 (Session 2025-2026, Pennsylvania) amends Title 75 (Vehicles) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes to address mobile work zone safety enforcement systems in lane-restricted work zones and to establish related penalties. The bill has four named co-sponsors: Andrew Kuzma, Roman Kozak, Brenda Pugh, and Josh Kail.

Purpose and intent

  • The primary aim is to improve safety and compliance in lane-restricted work zones by authorizing the use of mobile work zone safety enforcement systems.
  • These systems are intended to monitor and enforce speed and other traffic compliance specifically within work zones where lane restrictions apply, reducing risks to workers and motorists.

Key provisions

  • Authorization of mobile work zone safety enforcement systems in lane-restricted work zones:
    • The bill provides the statutory framework for deploying mobile systems (e.g., cameras or other monitored enforcement technologies) to enforce traffic laws in designated work zones with restricted lanes.
  • Enforcement authorities and procedures (as provided by the bill):
    • Establishes how enforcement actions will be carried out, including issuing citations or notices of violation related to mobile enforcement.
    • Likely outlines criteria for where these systems may be deployed, and the kinds of violations they can address (e.g., speeding, failure to comply with lane restrictions, or other traffic violations in work zones).
  • Penalties:
    • Imposes penalties associated with violations captured by the mobile enforcement systems.
    • Penalties are expected to align with existing Pennsylvania traffic violations but tailored to work zone contexts.
  • Administrative and procedural details:
    • May address data handling, notice requirements to violators, and mechanisms for adjudication or appeal.
    • Could specify the roles of state or local authorities in deploying and maintaining the enforcement systems.

Note: The available summary focuses on the bill’s stated approach to mobile work zone enforcement and general implications. The exact language would specify the precise violations enforceable, the penalty amounts, fine schedules, citation issuance processes, data privacy protections, and any exemptions or limitations.

Who would be affected

  • Drivers operating in lane-restricted work zones:
    • Targeted for enforcement actions and penalties resulting from violations detected by mobile work zone safety enforcement systems.
  • Construction and highway maintenance workers:
    • Beneficiaries of enhanced protection due to improved enforcement of traffic laws in active work zones.
  • Local and state transportation agencies:
    • Potentially responsible for implementing and maintaining enforcement systems, signage, and notification programs.
  • Law enforcement and judiciary:
    • Will handle citation issuance, processing, and adjudication related to mobile enforcement in work zones.

Procedural and timeline considerations

  • Enactment process:
    • As a proposed bill, it would need passage by both chambers of the Pennsylvania General Assembly and the governor’s signature to become law.
  • Implementation timeline:
    • The bill would likely include a phased rollout or effective date after enactment (e.g., a set number of days after signing) to allow agencies to deploy systems, train personnel, and establish procedures.
  • Regulatory alignment:
    • May require updates to related administrative regulations, traffic code provisions, and any necessary data-sharing agreements with law enforcement and court systems.

Practical considerations and potential impact

  • Safety improvements:
    • Real-time enforcement in lane-restricted work zones could deter speeding and unsafe driving near workers, potentially reducing accidents and injuries.
  • Privacy and civil liberty considerations:
    • Deployment of mobile enforcement systems raises questions about data handling, privacy protections, and notice to the public.
  • Fiscal impact:
    • Initial costs for equipment, training, and system maintenance, offset by potential revenue from fines and improved work zone safety outcomes.

If you’d like, I can pull the bill’s full text to extract exact definitions, specific penalties, citation procedures, and any amendments to other sections of Title 75 to provide a more precise clause-by-clause summary.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.