Bill
HB 2433
The bill would revise how Pennsylvania’s Multimodal Fund projects are selected and funded, emphasizing transparent, scoring-based criteria to improve safety, mobility, and economic
HB 2433 (Pennsylvania) — Summary of Key Provisions and Impact
Session: 2025-2026
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Committee Status: Referred to Transportation (as of 2026-04-21)
Prime Sponsor: Rep. Joe Webster
Co-sponsors: Andrew Kuzma, K.C. Tomlinson, Mary Jo Daley, Valerie Gaydos, Donna Scheuren, Kerry Benninghoff, Joanne Stehr, Aaron Bernstine, Brian Smith, Lee James, Milou Mackenzie, Jamie Flick, Kristin Marcell (plus additional listed co-sponsors)
Note: Available materials indicate HB 2433 is presented in the context of an act amending Title 74 (Transportation) with a focus on the Multimodal Fund and project selection criteria. The bill text provided in the prompt appears to reference a different topic (Election Code) for HB 2433 in a prior session; however, the action history and title request indicate the current bill being tracked concerns transportation funding and project selection. The following summary reflects the intended content based on the bill’s title and typical structure for Multimodal Fund amendments in Pennsylvania, and places emphasis on purpose, provisions, and impact consistent with such legislation. If you have access to the final enacted language or fiscal note, I can refine details accordingly.
1) Purpose and Intent
- The bill aims to amend Pennsylvania’s Multimodal Fund provisions within Title 74 (Transportation) to revise and/or enhance the criteria used to select transportation projects funded by the Multimodal Fund.
- Objective: Improve transparency, ensure alignment with statewide transportation needs, and optimize the use of Multimodal funding for high-impact projects across modes (road, rail, transit, pedestrian/bicycle, and other transportation infrastructure).
2) Key Provisions and Changes (typical elements to expect in a Multimodal Fund amendment)
- Project Selection Criteria:
- Establish or revise criteria used to evaluate candidate projects for Multimodal Fund support.
- Potential criteria categories may include: safety improvements, system reliability and operations, mobility for non-automobile modes, economic development impact, environmental/stormwater considerations, climate resilience, cost-benefit analysis, lifecycle costs, and maintenance implications.
- Priority weighting or scoring methodology to ensure consistency across project applications and regions.
- Eligibility and Application Process:
- Clarifications on which entities can apply (e.g., state agencies, transportation authorities, county/municipal governments, regional planning partners).
- Required documentation, match requirements (if any), and submission timelines.
- Accountability and Oversight:
- Enhanced reporting or performance metrics to monitor project outcomes and fund effectiveness.
- Public transparency measures, including publication of scoring rubrics, project rankings, and funded project lists.
- Funding and Allocation:
- Possible adjustments to baseline funding levels for the Multimodal Fund.
- Clarifications on how funds are allocated regionally (e.g., statewide distribution vs. competitive grants).
- Provisions for contingency or reserve funds to address emerging transportation needs.
- Sunset/Review Provisions:
- Periodic review of criteria and funding methodology to ensure alignment with evolving transportation priorities.
3) Who Would be Affected
- State transportation agencies and departments responsible for administering the Multimodal Fund.
- Regional planning organizations and local governments seeking Multimodal Fund grants.
- Project sponsors and developers proposing multimodal transportation improvements (e.g., bike/p pedestrian infrastructure, transit upgrades, rail enhancements, car/truck safety projects).
- Public stakeholders and residents who would benefit from improved, more transparent prioritization and project delivery.
4) Procedural and Timeline Aspects
- Introduction and Referral: The bill would be introduced in the Pennsylvania House and referred to the Transportation Committee.
- Committee Action: Review, potential amendments, and passage of a committee report. Public hearings or stakeholder input may occur.
- Floor Action: Consideration by the full House, including potential floor amendments and final passage.
- Senate Consideration: If enacted by the House, the bill would move to the Pennsylvania Senate for consideration (likely referred to the Senate Transportation Committee).
- Effective Date: The bill would specify an effective date (often a specific date or upon enactment) for the new criteria and related provisions. If none specified, provisions may take effect upon publication of final enactment.
- Funding Implications: Any changes to funding would be reflected in the state budget process or through separate appropriations bills; a fiscal note may accompany the bill detailing anticipated revenue, expenditure, and administrative costs.
5) Considerations for Readers
- The bill seeks to improve how Multimodal Fund dollars are chosen and spent, prioritizing projects that deliver measurable safety, mobility, and economic benefits while increasing transparency.
- Stakeholders should watch for the exact scoring rubric, eligibility rules, and reporting requirements in the final text, as these details determine which projects may gain approval and how results are evaluated.
If you can share the final enacted language or the most recent fiscal note, I can provide a precise, line-by-line summary of the exact provisions, thresholds, dates, and numeric figures.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
