WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 635

An Act amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in sentencing, providing for sentencing for offenses committed near drug and alcohol recovery houses.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Michele Brooks and 7 co-sponsors

Creates a statewide framework and fund to prioritize and build wildlife crossings, reducing vehicle-wildlife collisions and protecting species.

Referred to Judiciary
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 635

SB 635 — Wildlife: Protections and Highway Crossings

Status: Introduced (Senate); committee actions pending. Introduced Jan 25, 2025. Effective date in fiscal analysis: July 1, 2025.

Purpose / Intent

Establish a coordinated, statewide approach to improve wildlife habitat connectivity and reduce vehicle–wildlife collisions by creating the Maryland Connectivity Coalition (MCC), a dedicated Wildlife Connectivity Fund, and requirements for State and local planning, project prioritization, reporting, and public outreach.

Key provisions

  • Maryland Connectivity Coalition (MCC)

    • Creates MCC to foster collaboration among State & federal agencies, NGOs, regional coalitions, and other stakeholders.
    • Membership includes the Secretary of Natural Resources (DNR), the State Highway Administrator (SHA) or designees, one member each appointed from the House and Senate, and other agency/NGO/private representatives selected by DNR and SHA.
    • SHA (or its designee) must serve as chair.
    • DNR and SHA must adopt rules governing membership, roles, meeting procedures, and other coalition operations.
    • MCC duties: develop project prioritization criteria, performance metrics (e.g., collision reductions, connectivity improvements), meet quarterly to share data and recommend fund disbursements, and publish information on a public website (purpose, membership, meeting agendas/minutes, criteria, data, completed and in‑progress crossings).

  • Wildlife Connectivity Fund

    • Establishes a special, nonlapsing Wildlife Connectivity Fund administered by DNR in consultation with SHA.
    • Fund sources: State appropriations, interest, donations, and other money designated for the Fund.
    • Fund used to protect terrestrial/semiaquatic threatened or endangered species and to reduce vehicle–wildlife collisions through wildlife crossings and related measures.

  • State Highway Administration (SHA) authority and reporting

    • SHA has final decision‑making authority regarding placement, funding, and design of wildlife crossings on State highways.
    • SHA must include wildlife‑crossing information in each Consolidated Transportation Program (CTP): TTF expenditures for crossings, planned/in‑process projects, and measurable outcomes/performance metrics.

  • Local planning and coordination

    • Counties and local jurisdictions must consider wildlife movement and habitat connectivity when enacting, adopting, amending, or executing comprehensive plans.
    • Maryland Department of Planning (MDP) shall coordinate with DNR and SHA to provide jurisdictions updated connectivity information and planned crossings.

  • Data handling, public outreach, and donations

    • DNR to develop and maintain a website for MCC and to accept donations to the Wildlife Connectivity Fund; MCC website must provide educational materials and project information.

Who is affected

  • State agencies: DNR and SHA take lead responsibilities; both will adopt implementing rules.
  • Local governments: required to consider wildlife connectivity in comprehensive plans (planning process impact).
  • Motorists and wildlife: intended public safety and conservation benefits through reduced collisions and improved habitat connectivity.
  • NGOs/private donors: potential partners and funders via donations; MCC includes NGO representation.

Fiscal and procedural notes

  • Fiscal estimate (Maryland Department of Legislative Services): SHA Transportation Trust Fund expenditures may increase by ~$50,000 annually beginning FY2026 (consultant/staffing support for MCC activities). No direct revenue effect; local government fiscal impact expected to be minimal.
  • Coalition meetings: quarterly (may be canceled for lack of agenda).
  • Reporting: SHA to include required CTP reporting on wildlife crossings.
  • Implementation/timing: bill provisions in analysis reference an effective date of July 1, 2025 (verify enacted version and official effective date).

Potential impacts

  • Positive: Creates a formal multi‑stakeholder process to prioritize and evaluate wildlife‑connectivity projects; aims to reduce vehicle–wildlife collisions and protect threatened species.
  • Tradeoffs: SHA retains final project authority (centralized decision‑making); modest recurring State costs anticipated for coalition support; local planning processes will need to incorporate additional considerations.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.