WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 905

An Act amending Title 40 (Insurance) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in regulation of insurers and related persons generally, providing for addiction treatment services information collection and reporting.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Jay Costa and 4 co-sponsors

Expands identity fraud laws to criminalize using AI or deepfake representations to impersonate, defraud, or harm others, and allows civil relief for victims.

Referred to Banking & Insurance
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 905

Summary — SB 905: Criminal Law — Identity Fraud — Artificial Intelligence and Deepfake Representations

Status & Timeline
- Introduced: January 24, 2025 (Senate Bill 905, Judicial Proceedings Committee; sponsor: Sen. Hester)
- Hearing: February 26, 2025
- Enacted: Signed by Governor June 20, 2025
- Effective date: September 1, 2025
- Companion bill: HB 1425 (Delegate Wilson)

Purpose
- Expand Maryland’s identity fraud laws to address modern misuses of personal identifying information, including harms produced through artificial intelligence (AI) and “deepfake” media, and to create a civil remedy for victims.

Key definitions added
- “Deepfake representation”: a photograph, film, video, audio recording, digital image, picture, or computer-generated image that is indistinguishable from an actual, identifiable human being. Excludes drawings, cartoons, sculptures, and paintings.
- “Indistinguishable from an actual and identifiable human being”: an image an ordinary person would conclude is of an actual person; explicitly includes computer‑generated images made to appear real.
- “Harm”: physical injury, serious emotional distress, or economic damages.
- “Artificial intelligence”: defined by reference to the State Finance and Procurement Article (§3.5–801).

Primary substantive changes
- Prohibits knowingly, willfully, and with fraudulent intent using another person’s personal identifying information without consent to cause “harm” (broadening prior prohibitions tied to obtaining value or health access).
- Expands the existing prohibition against assuming another’s identity (including fictitious identities) to include use intended to harm, harass, intimidate, threaten, or coerce the person whose identity is assumed.
- Prohibits knowingly, willfully, and with fraudulent intent using AI or deepfake representations to:
- Impersonate or falsely depict another person with intent to defraud, mislead, or cause harm; or
- Create or distribute false records to cause harm, induce disclosure of personal identifying information, or obtain benefits/credit/services.

Criminal penalties
- Existing value-based penalty tiers remain (examples):
- <$1,500: misdemeanor — up to 1 year imprisonment and/or up to $500 fine.
- $1,500–<$25,000: felony — up to 5 years and/or up to $10,000 fine.
- $25,000–<$100,000: felony — up to 10 years and/or up to $15,000 fine.
- ≥$100,000: felony — up to 20 years and/or up to $25,000 fine.
- AI/deepfake-specific penalties:
- Violation involving one victim: felony — up to 5 years imprisonment and/or up to $10,000 fine.
- Violation involving two or more victims: felony — up to 10 years imprisonment and/or up to $15,000 fine.

Civil remedy
- A victim of prohibited conduct under the AI/deepfake provisions may bring a civil action in court seeking injunctions and “any other appropriate relief” against the perpetrator(s).

Who is affected
- Individuals whose personal identifying information or likeness is used without consent; victims of harassment, impersonation, stalking, financial fraud, or reputational harm caused by AI/deepfakes.
- Perpetrators who create, use, or distribute AI-generated or deepfake content to defraud or harm.
- Courts, prosecutors, and defense counsel (potential modest increase in caseloads); limited expected fiscal impact.

Fiscal/operational impact
- Department of Legislative Services fiscal note: not expected to materially affect State or local finances or operations; minor increased workload for public defense potentially manageable within existing resources.

Notes
- The bill amends Maryland Criminal Law §8–301 and cross-references the State Finance and Procurement definition of AI.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.