WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 411

An Act amending the act of May 29, 2012 (P.L.549, No.54), known as the Stroke System of Care Act, further providing for definitions; providing for Statewide stroke registry; and making an editorial change .

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Camera Bartolotta and 8 co-sponsors

Automated school bus camera footage is admissible as evidence, and contracts for camera services may extend up to 5 years with optional renewal.

Act No. 24 of 2025
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 411

Summary — SB 411: School Bus Cameras / Evidence & Contract Length

Status: Passed 1st Reading (Introduced Feb 14, 2025)
Subject areas: school buses, motor vehicles, cameras/monitoring, evidence, courts, public transportation, safety

Main purpose

SB 411 (NC) (School Bus Cameras/Evidence & Contract Length) makes two primary changes:
1. Clarifies the evidentiary status of photographs and video recorded by automated school bus safety cameras for prosecutions of failures to stop for school buses.
2. Extends the maximum length of service contracts that local boards of education may enter with private vendors to install and operate automated school bus safety cameras.

Key provisions

  • Admissibility and prima facie evidence (amendment to G.S. 20‑217)

    • Photographs or video from an automated school bus safety camera are admissible in proceedings alleging a violation of the statute requiring motorists to stop for stopped school buses, provided the recordings are consistent with the North Carolina Rules of Evidence.
    • Recorded images that show a school bus was stopped and displaying a mechanical stop signal or flashing red lights are established as prima facie evidence that:
    • the bus was stopped for the purpose of receiving or discharging passengers; and
    • the bus was equipped and marked in compliance with the law.
    • The statute also provides that failure to produce the camera photograph/video does not bar prosecution — other evidence may still be used.

  • Contract length for automated school bus safety camera services (amendment to G.S. 115C‑242.1)

    • Local boards of education (in counties that have adopted the relevant ordinance) may contract with private vendors to install and operate automated school bus safety cameras.
    • Contracts must be let in accordance with state procurement provisions (G.S. 143‑129).
    • The maximum length of any such contract is increased from 3 years to 5 years.
    • A contract may include an option to renew or extend for one additional term, also not to exceed 5 years.

Who is affected

  • Motorists: increased use of camera evidence to cite or prosecute unlawful passing of stopped school buses.
  • School districts / local boards of education: can enter longer vendor contracts (up to 5 years, plus one renewal term).
  • Private vendors: longer contract terms may change procurement dynamics and vendor relations.
  • Courts and prosecutors: will receive and evaluate camera-generated evidence subject to Rules of Evidence; prima facie findings created by recorded images may streamline some prosecutions.
  • Counties: only applies where county has adopted the enabling ordinance referenced in G.S. 153A‑246.

Effective dates and applicability

  • Evidentiary provision (G.S. 20‑217 amendment): becomes effective December 1, 2025, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date.
  • Contract length provision (G.S. 115C‑242.1 amendment): becomes effective July 1, 2025, and applies to contracts issued, renewed, or amended on or after that date.

Practical impacts and considerations

  • Enforcement: camera recordings designated as prima facie evidence may make it easier to issue citations and obtain convictions for stop‑arm violations, potentially improving student safety at bus stops.
  • Legal process: admissibility is still subject to rules of evidence; courts will determine weight and reliability in prosecutions. The bill preserves prosecutors’ ability to proceed when camera evidence is unavailable.
  • Procurement & cost: longer allowable contract terms may encourage investment by vendors and reduce turnover, but could also reduce frequency of competitive rebidding; boards must still follow statutory procurement rules.
  • Privacy and administrative issues: increased camera use raises typical considerations about data retention, access, redaction, and compliance with state law for handling recorded images (not addressed in this bill).

If you want, I can:
- Draft a plain‑language one‑page explainer for the public or school boards.
- Identify potential statutory or administrative follow‑ups (e.g., data-retention rules, procurement language, model ordinance).

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.