WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 22

An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in personal income tax, further providing for definitions and for classes of income.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Joe Ciresi and 9 co-sponsors

The bill clarifies and expands fire investigation powers by defining SBI and OSFM roles, enabling subpoenas, entry, witness compulsion, and private investigations, with SBI gaining

Referred to Finance
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 22

HB 22 — Fire Investigation Law Revisions (North Carolina)

Status: Reported Favorably as Committee Substitute (Reptd. Fav. Com. Substitute) — introduced Jan 2025; committee substitute reported 3/11/2025

Purpose

To revise and clarify the investigatory powers, authority and procedures governing fire investigations under Article 79, Chapter 58 of the North Carolina General Statutes — in particular to (1) define supervisory authority between the State Bureau of Investigation (SBI) and the Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM), (2) expand and codify investigative powers (subpoena, entry, witness compulsion), and (3) streamline evidence-sharing and reporting obligations.

Key provisions (summary of substantive changes)

  • Amends multiple sections of Article 79 (G.S. 58-79-1, 58-79-5, 58-79-10, 58-79-15, 58-79-40) to clarify roles and powers of SBI and OSFM in fire investigations.
  • Supervisory authority:
    • Both the Director of the SBI and the State Fire Marshal retain the right to supervise and direct investigations.
    • If a local official requests investigative assistance from a State agency, the SBI Director is given exclusive supervisory authority in specified serious cases: death or serious bodily injury, first- or second-degree arson, fires in buildings owned/occupied by state or local government, and buildings owned/leased by educational institutions, churches, or religious buildings.
  • Investigative and enforcement powers:
    • SBI/State Fire Marshal (and their deputies) may summon and compel attendance of witnesses, administer oaths, and take testimony under oath.
    • They have the authority to enter and examine any building or adjoining premises at any time (day or night) for purposes of the investigation.
    • Investigations may be conducted privately; witnesses may be sequestered.
    • If, based on the investigation, there is evidence of arson or related crimes, the SBI Director may arrest (by warrant) or cause arrests and must deliver evidence to the appropriate district attorney.
  • Compliance and penalties:
    • Failure to comply with an SBI/OSFM subpoena or summons may be treated as contempt and brought before a court of record.
    • False swearing during investigations is perjury and subject to criminal penalties.
  • Information sharing:
    • Revises authorities for requesting and obtaining information from insurance companies and other entities (details in §58-79-40 are updated in the bill).

Who is affected

  • State agencies: SBI and OSFM (expanded/clarified duties and powers)
  • Local officials: municipal fire chiefs, chiefs of police, county fire marshals, sheriffs, and rural fire department chiefs (initial investigative responsibilities remain but supervision rules change when state assistance is requested)
  • Insurance companies and private investigators (obligated to furnish evidence and information upon request, per revised provisions)
  • Property owners, occupants, and witnesses involved in fire investigations
  • Prosecutors and defendants in arson-related prosecutions (evidence and investigatory processes may change)

Potential impacts

  • Operational: centralizes oversight in certain serious cases under the SBI, which could improve coordination on complex or criminal investigations but may increase SBI workload and require resource adjustments.
  • Legal/procedural: clarifies subpoena and entry authority, which may speed evidence collection but could raise questions about limits on privacy or property rights; contempt/perjury mechanisms strengthen enforcement of cooperation.
  • Interagency relations: formalizes when SBI has exclusive supervisory control (serious incidents), potentially reducing jurisdictional disputes but also changing local-state dynamics.

Procedural/timeline notes

  • Introduced in early 2025; committee substitute reported favorably on 3/11/2025 (documented as “Reptd. Fav. Com. Substitute”).
  • As of the committee-report status provided, the bill had progressed out of committee; interested readers should check the NC General Assembly docket for subsequent floor votes, Senate action, or final enactment.

If you want, I can:
- Pull and quote the exact amended statutory language for each section (G.S. 58-79-1, -5, -10, -15, -40);
- Compare this version to current statute to show exact additions/deletions; or
- Track the bill’s latest status and provide final vote/engrossment/enactment updates.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.