WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 749

An Act amending the act of March 10, 1949 (P.L.30, No.14), known as the Public School Code of 1949, in student supports, providing for parental notification.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Jay Costa and 8 co-sponsors

SB 749 lets courts impose job search or work-related training as a contempt condition for delinquent child support, with 30-day progress checks and up to 6 months training.

Referred to Education
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 749

Summary — SB 749: Work Training/Delinquent Child Support

Status & procedural history
- Bill number / short title: SB 749 — "Work Training/Delinquent Child Support"
- Introduced: Feb 21, 2025
- Current status reported by user: Passed 1st Reading (referred to committee(s) per chamber rules)
- Effective date: “This act is effective when it becomes law.”

Purpose / intent
- To create a court‑ordered alternative to incarceration for individuals found in contempt for delinquent child support by allowing courts to require job search activity or work‑specific education/training as a special condition of a contempt order. The aim is to promote employment, increase child support compliance, and reduce use of jail as enforcement.

Key provisions
- Adds an option to G.S. 50‑13.4(f) (remedies for enforcement of support) allowing a court, as a special condition of contempt, to direct the obligor into:
- job search activities; or
- specified work‑related education or training.
- Court monitoring:
- The court must review the person’s progress at least every 30 days, unless the person is enrolled and actively participating in work‑specific training.
- Training limits and conditions:
- Enrollment in work‑specific training is limited to a maximum of six months.
- While participating, the person must:
- pay at least $50 per month toward child support;
- notify the court upon completion of the training; and
- notify the court within 14 days if they fail to meet attendance requirements.
- Other enforcement rules remain intact (civil and criminal contempt processes continue to apply).

Who is affected
- Primary: noncustodial parents found delinquent on child support (subjects of contempt orders).
- Secondary: family courts (judges and clerks), child support enforcement agencies, workforce development and adult education providers that may deliver or certify the specified training, and custodial parents/children (potential beneficiaries if compliance increases).

Potential impacts & considerations
- Expected benefits: provides constructive alternative to incarceration, may increase employment and regular support payments, reduces incarceration costs and collateral harms to families.
- Operational implications: requires courts to monitor progress periodically and may increase referrals to workforce/education programs; availability and capacity of appropriate training programs will affect implementation.
- Compliance risk: minimal payment floor ($50/month) may be insufficient in some cases; enforcement if participants do not comply remains a policy choice for the court (including reverting to contempt sanctions).

Legislative next steps
- Bill will proceed through committee consideration, possible amendments, and further readings before any final passage and enactment.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.