WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 452

An Act amending the act of April 9, 1929 (P.L.343, No.176), known as The Fiscal Code, in additional special funds and restricted accounts, providing for Safe Path Restricted Account; and making a transfer.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Carolyn Comitta and 6 co-sponsors

Sets the marriage age at 18+, with a narrow 16–17 exception requiring court order or parental consent after judicial review, reducing under-18 marriages.

Referred to Education
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 452

SB 452 — "End Child Marriage." (North Carolina, 2025) — Bill Summary

Note: multiple different bills numbered SB 452 appear in the document packet (from other states/subjects). This summary addresses the North Carolina bill titled "End Child Marriage" (filed 02/18/2025).

Purpose / Intent

SB 452 seeks to limit legal marriage to adults and substantially restrict under‑age marriage. The bill’s primary intent is to ensure that only adults (age 18 or older) may lawfully marry, while retaining a narrow, court‑supervised exception for some 16–17‑year‑olds under strict judicial review.

Key provisions

  • Lawful marriage age
    • Establishes that only unmarried persons age 18 or older may lawfully marry.
    • Reaffirms that it is unlawful for any person under 16 to marry.
  • Narrow exception for 16–17 year olds
    • A person over 16 and under 18 may marry only if:
    • The other party is no more than four years older; and
    • A certified district court order authorizing the marriage is filed with the register of deeds, OR written consent is filed (parent with custody or legal guardian).
    • The court may issue such an order only after finding that the underage party is capable of assuming marriage responsibilities and that the marriage is in the minor’s best interest.
  • Judicial authorization process (G.S. 51‑2.1, as rewritten)
    • An underage party must file a civil action in district court seeking authorization.
    • Court costs collected per G.S. 7A‑305; a guardian ad litem (GAL), who must be an attorney, is appointed to represent the minor’s best interests.
    • The court must consider specified factors (parents’/guardians’ opinions, GAL’s opinion, relationships, and any other relevant evidence).
    • There is a rebuttable presumption that marriage is not in the minor’s best interest if all living parents oppose.
    • Pregnancy or childbirth alone does not establish that marriage is in the minor’s best interest.
    • If judicial authorization is denied, the minor cannot reapply under this section for one year.
    • Hearings are recorded; rules of civil evidence generally apply.
  • License issuance
    • Registers of deeds may issue licenses for 16–17 year olds only after required court order or written consent is filed as specified.
  • Procedural references
    • GAL payment and related procedural matters are tied to existing statutory provisions (e.g., G.S. 7A‑451(f)).

Who is affected

  • Minors and families: reduces routine avenues for under‑18 marriages; creates a court gatekeeping process for limited cases.
  • District courts: increases workload (civil petitions, hearings, findings of fact, GAL appointment).
  • Registers of deeds: changed documentation required before issuing licenses for under‑18 applicants.
  • Guardians ad litem, attorneys, and potentially local legal service providers: increased demand for representation and investigation in judicial authorization cases.

Procedural / timeline notes

  • Introduced: February 18, 2025.
  • Status (from provided actions): Passed first reading and referred to committees; multiple committee hearings and amendments were recorded in the legislative history included. (For current bill status consult the General Assembly’s official docket or bill tracking service.)
  • Effective date: not specified in the excerpt — would be determined in the enacted text or effective date provision.

Potential impacts / considerations

  • Expected to reduce the number of under‑18 marriages and increase protections for minors.
  • May impose additional costs on courts and require funding for GALs and court processing.
  • Could generate demand for legal aid and advocacy services for minors seeking authorization.
  • The narrow exception preserves judicial discretion for exceptional cases (e.g., some family or safety circumstances), but establishes heightened procedural safeguards (GAL, findings, presumption where parents oppose).

If you want, I can:
- Extract and format the precise statutory language changes (G.S. citations) side‑by‑side with current law; or
- Produce a short stakeholder impact memo (courts, registers of deeds, child welfare advocates, legal services).

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.