WeVote

Bill

Bill

S 1018

An Act allowing municipalities to preserve owner occupancy

194th Legislature (2025-2026) Introduced by Patrick O'Connor

MA S.1018 lets municipalities opt to require owner-occupancy for ADUs, reversing a 2024 ban and giving local control over rental supply and housing policy.

Accompanied a study order, see S2766
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 1018

Summary — S 1018

Note on documents provided
- The materials supplied appear to combine two different bills that share the number “S 1018” but are from different jurisdictions and address entirely different subjects. One is a Massachusetts bill titled “An Act allowing municipalities to preserve owner occupancy” (MA S.1018). The other is an Idaho Senate bill that amends counseling/therapist licensing statutes to make fingerprint checks discretionary (ID SB 1018). Below are concise, separate summaries of each version and a short note on procedural/status inconsistencies to help you verify which bill you intend to track.

A. Massachusetts: “An Act allowing municipalities to preserve owner occupancy” (MA S.1018)

Purpose and intent
- To restore local discretion by allowing municipalities to adopt or retain owner-occupancy requirements for accessory dwelling units (ADUs). The change reverses part of Chapter 150 of the Acts of 2024 that limited municipal authority.

Key provision
- Amends Section 8 of Chapter 150 of the Acts of 2024 by striking “shall not” and replacing it with “may.” In practice, this changes a statewide prohibition into a permissive grant of authority, enabling municipalities to opt to preserve owner-occupancy requirements for ADUs.

Who is affected
- Municipal governments: gain explicit authority to require owner-occupancy for ADUs.
- Property owners and developers: local rules could restrict the ability to rent ADUs or use them as non-owner-occupied rental units.
- Renters and housing market: potential for reduced supply of long-term rental units in jurisdictions that adopt owner-occupancy requirements.

Procedural / timeline notes
- Filed as Senate Docket No. 2085 on 1/17/2025 (petitioned by Sen. Patrick M. O’Connor).
- Referred to committee on Housing (per provided actions).
- Hearing scheduled (per the bill information provided) for 06/25/2025, 1:00–5:00 PM in room B-1.
- Recommendation for tracking: confirm the bill number and text on the Massachusetts Legislature website to get committee reports, amendments, and final status.

Potential impacts to watch
- Local adoption: if many municipalities exercise the “may” option, ADU rental supply could decline locally.
- Housing policy trade-offs: increased local control vs. statewide housing production goals enacted in 2024.

B. Idaho: Amendments to counselor/therapist licensing (ID SB 1018)

Purpose and intent
- To make fingerprint-based criminal history background checks for counselor and therapist licensure discretionary — required only if the Division of Occupational and Professional Licenses (DOPL) determines fingerprinting is necessary.

Key provisions / statutory changes
- Amends Idaho Code sections 54-3405, 54-3405A, 54-3405B, and 54-3405C (which set licensure qualifications for licensed professional counselors, licensed clinical professional counselors, licensed associate marriage and family therapists, and licensed marriage and family therapists).
- Replaces blanket language requiring fingerprint-based criminal history background checks with wording that requires such checks only “if required by the division of occupational and professional licenses.”
- Includes an emergency clause making the act effective immediately upon passage.

Fiscal note / budget impact
- Fiscal note (revised) states no impact to the state General Fund, dedicated funds, or federal funds. It notes the change is responsive to a prior 2024 law (H 490) that had added fingerprinting in anticipation of an interstate compact that did not pass.
- Potential minor revenue increases noted only for certain second violations (per the fiscal note language).

Who is affected
- Applicants and licensees in counseling and marriage & family therapy professions in Idaho.
- DOPL: gains discretion to require fingerprinting where it deems necessary; otherwise fingerprinting may not be performed.
- Public safety and employers: potential changes in background check practices depending on DOPL’s implementation.

Procedural / timeline notes
- The Idaho bill text includes an emergency declaration. Fiscal note dated 02/03/2025; other Idaho legislative actions in Jan 2025 are listed in the supplied materials. Verify the Idaho Legislature records for current committee referral/status.

Important cross-document inconsistencies to verify

  • Sponsors listed in the provided “Bill Information” (Catherine Cortez Masto, Mike Rounds) are U.S. Senators and do not match the Massachusetts or Idaho sponsors cited in the bill texts (MA petition by Patrick O’Connor; Idaho Commerce & Human Resources Committee).
  • The provided legislative actions include dates and events from multiple states (Idaho and Massachusetts) mixed together.

Recommendation
- Confirm which S 1018 (state and chamber) you want to follow. Use the appropriate state legislature website (Massachusetts General Court or Idaho Legislature) and the docket/bill number to retrieve the authoritative bill text, sponsors, committee referrals, hearing notices, and amendments. If you’d like, tell me which jurisdiction you want prioritized and I will produce a focused, updated tracking summary.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.