WeVote

Bill

Bill

SF 4787

Advertising services tax creation

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Scott Dibble and 2 co-sponsors

The bill would create a new statewide Advertising Services Tax on advertising services in Minnesota, defining the taxable base, rate, administration, exemptions, and how revenues a

Author added McEwen
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 4787

Summary of SF 4787 (Minnesota, 2025-2026)

Purpose and intent

SF 4787 proposes the creation of an Advertising Services Tax. The bill establishes a new statewide tax on certain advertising services, laying out the framework for how the tax would be imposed, collected, and administered. The core aim appears to be broadening the tax base to capture revenue from advertising-related activities that occur within the state.

Key provisions and changes

  • Taxable services: The bill defines the scope of advertising services subject to the new tax. While the exact statutory language is not provided here, the likely coverage includes services such as digital advertising placements, media buying, ad agency services, and possibly other promotional services tied to advertising campaigns. The precise inclusions, exemptions, and any thresholds would be specified in the statute.

  • Tax rate and base: SF 4787 sets forth the tax rate and the base upon which the tax applies. The bill would specify whether the tax is applied to gross receipts, consideration, or another measure of value, and whether it applies to specific components of advertising services (e.g., service fees, media charges, platform fees).

  • Tax administration and collection: The bill outlines administration by the Minnesota Department of Revenue (or a designated agency). It would cover:

    • Registration requirements for advertisers, agencies, platforms, and other providers of advertising services.
    • Filing frequency (monthly, quarterly, etc.) and due dates.
    • Reporting requirements, including potential separate line items for taxable services.
    • Collection mechanisms, enforcement provisions, penalties for noncompliance, and interest.
  • Exemptions and special provisions: Provisions for exemptions (e.g., for nonprofit organizations, government entities, or certain types of internal advertising) and any special rules (such as for inter-state transactions or marketplace facilitators) would be defined. There could also be provisions addressing apportionment for out-of-state providers or users.

  • Effective date and phase-in (timing): The bill would specify when the tax takes effect (e.g., a specific start date) and whether there is a transition period or phasing to ease implementation for affected businesses.

  • Revenue use: The bill may indicate how anticipated revenues would be used (e.g., general fund, specific programs, or earmarked purposes). If not explicit, the standard practice is to deposit into the general fund unless otherwise stated.

Who would be affected

  • Advertising service providers: Advertising agencies, digital platform providers, media buyers, and other organizations delivering or facilitating advertising services in Minnesota would be directly subject to the new tax.

  • Clients and advertisers: Businesses that pay for advertising services could experience additional costs, depending on how the tax base is defined and whether pass-through of the tax is allowed or required.

  • Marketplace facilitators: If the bill includes marketplace provisions, platforms that connect advertisers with sellers of advertising services may have compliance responsibilities and potential remittance duties.

  • Public and nonprofit entities: Depending on exemptions, government or nonprofit users of advertising services could be affected or exempt.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduction and first reading: The bill was introduced and assigned to the Taxes committee on March 25, 2026.

  • Referred to committee: The bill was referred to the Taxes committee for consideration and potential amendment and vote.

  • Sponsors: Primary and co-sponsors include Representative(s) Scott Dibble and Ann Rest, indicating a bipartisan legislative interest.

  • Moving forward: If advanced, the bill would proceed through committee hearings, potential amendments, Floor votes in the Senate, and eventual concurrence with or passage by the House (or vice versa, depending on the specific chamber status). A fiscal note may be issued detailing projected revenue and administrative costs.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to include a line-by-line section of the bill’s provisions once the full text becomes available, or add a comparison with existing Minnesota tax practices (e.g., services tax framework) to provide clearer context.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.