WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 2382

Accident report requirements modified, and local law enforcement authorized to provide certain data to contracted service providers for purposes of accident reporting.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Elliott Engen and 1 co-sponsor

HF 2382 lets local police share specific accident data with contracted service providers to speed and improve accident reporting, with safeguards for privacy and use.

Introduction and first reading, referred to Transportation Finance and Policy
#lawenforcement #motorvehicles
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 2382

Summary of HF 2382 (2025) — Accident report requirements and data sharing with contracted service providers

Overview

  • Bill number: HF 2382
  • Title: Accident report requirements modified, and local law enforcement authorized to provide certain data to contracted service providers for purposes of accident reporting
  • Status: Introduction and first reading; referred to the Transportation Finance and Policy Committee
  • Introduced: March 17, 2025
  • Companion: SF 2643 (Senate)

HF 2382 appears to modify Minnesota’s accident reporting framework and authorizes local law enforcement to share certain data with contracted service providers for accident reporting purposes. The explicit text of the provisions is not provided in the summary, but the bill’s stated intent indicates two main thrusts: (1) changes to how accident reports are compiled or submitted, and (2) authorization for data sharing between law enforcement and contracted entities to support accident reporting.

Key Provisions (as described)

  • Modification of accident report requirements. The bill would alter existing requirements governing accident reporting. The specifics (who must report, what data must be included, timing, and format) will be defined in the bill text.
  • Authorized data sharing with contracted service providers. Local law enforcement would be authorized to provide certain data to contracted service providers for the purpose of accident reporting. The bill would specify:
    • What data can be shared
    • Which local law enforcement entities are covered
    • Safeguards, privacy protections, and permissible uses
    • Any oversight or compliance requirements

Details such as data elements, conditions, and procedures are pending in the full text.

Affected Parties

  • Local law enforcement agencies in Minnesota (as the data-sharing authority and modified reporting framework involve them directly).
  • Individuals involved in motor vehicle accidents (through modified reporting requirements and potential changes to how information is collected and shared).
  • Contracted service providers that perform accident reporting services (authorized recipients of data under the bill).
  • Public safety and transportation policy stakeholders who oversee and implement accident reporting systems.

Procedural and Timeline Considerations

  • The bill has been introduced and referred to the Transportation Finance and Policy committee, signaling initial committee consideration and potential amendments.
  • Next steps typically include committee hearings, potential amendments, and floor votes in the House, followed by potential consideration by the Senate (and the companion SF 2643) or a conference committee if differences arise.
  • If enacted, the bill would take effect according to the date specified in the final text (not provided here).

Potential Impacts and Considerations

  • Efficiency and accuracy: Streamlined accident reporting processes and access to data via contracted providers could improve the timeliness and quality of reports.
  • Privacy and security: Data-sharing with contracted providers raises privacy and data security considerations. The bill is expected to include safeguards, access controls, and use limitations.
  • Policy alignment: Coordination with existing reporting systems and interagency data exchange policies will be important to avoid duplication and ensure consistency.

For a detailed understanding of the exact data elements, safeguards, and implementation timeline, readers should consult the full bill text and any fiscal notes or committee testimony as the bill progresses.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.