WeVote
Log In

Bill

AA

Bill

SRES 93

A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that the operations of the National Institutes of Health should not experience any interruption, delay, or funding disruption in violation of the law and that the workforce of the National Institutes of Health is essential to sustaining medical progress.

119th Congress Introduced by Angela Alsobrooks and 22 co-sponsors

NIH operations and funding should remain uninterrupted, because the NIH workforce is essential to medical progress and national health security.

Introduced in Senate
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SRES 93

Summary of Bill: SRES 93

A Senate resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that NIH operations should not be interrupted or disrupted and that the NIH workforce is essential to medical progress.

Overview

SRES 93 is a non-binding Senate resolution introduced on February 25, 2025. It states the sense of the Senate that National Institutes of Health (NIH) operations should not experience interruptions, delays, or funding disruptions in violation of the law, and it emphasizes that the NIH workforce is essential to sustaining medical progress and national health security. The resolution highlights NIH’s role in funding research across a broad range of diseases and conditions.

Purpose and Intention

  • Protect NIH operations from disruption: The resolution asserts that NIH activities and funding for research should not be subject to interruption or delay in violation of the law, aiming to safeguard ongoing biomedical research and its timeline.
  • Recognize the NIH workforce: It emphasizes that scientists, researchers, and medical professionals at NIH are essential to medical progress and national preparedness for public health challenges.
  • Affirm national interests: The language frames NIH stability as important to health, economic vitality, and national security.

Key Provisions

  • NIH Operations: The resolution states that NIH operations should not face interruption, delay, or funding disruption in violation of the law.
  • Research Emphasis: It explicitly references NIH funding for research on childhood cancers, Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes, heart disease, infectious disease, ALS, and other conditions.
  • Workforce Importance: It characterizes NIH’s workforce as essential to sustaining medical progress and notes that interference would undermine life-saving treatments, weaken the biomedical enterprise, and weaken public health response capabilities.

Scope and Nature

  • Type: Resolution (non-binding, sense-of-the-Senate statement).
  • Effect: Expresses intent and priority, not a statute or appropriation, and does not by itself authorize funding or impose legal requirements.
  • Relationship to Law: Frames compliance as a matter of upholding the law and protecting operations, but does not change existing statutory or budgetary processes.

Affected Parties

  • Primary: National Institutes of Health, including its scientists, researchers, and medical professionals.
  • Broader: U.S. patients and public health infrastructure, which could benefit from continued NIH funding and uninterrupted research.

Legislative Path and Timeline

  • Status: Introduced in the Senate; referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) on February 25, 2025.
  • Text reference: The introduced text is noted as “CR S1352.”
  • Sponsors: Led by Primary Sponsor Senator Richard J. Durbin, with a broad group of cosponsors including Senators Chuck Schumer, Amy Klobuchar, Angus King, Jacky Rosen, Patrick Leahy, Ron Wyden, Tammy Duckworth, Mazie Hirono, Alex Padilla, Martin Heinrich, and many others. Notable leadership and seniority figures are among the cosponsors.

Potential Impact

  • Non-binding signal: As a sense resolution, it serves to express congressional priorities and reassure the public and NIH staff about congressional intent, rather than create new legal obligations or funding.
  • Policy guidance: It may influence perceptions of NIH stability and inform discussions about funding continuity and preparedness, particularly during periods of budgetary or political uncertainty.
  • Public health messaging: Reiterates the importance of maintaining uninterrupted NIH operations to sustain medical progress and national health security.

If you’d like, I can compare SRES 93 to similar past resolutions or draft a quick one-paragraph layperson-friendly explainer for publication.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.