Bill

BILL • US SENATE

SRES 682

A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate by condemning the handling of the 2019 Ukraine Whistleblower Complaint, calling for the Department of Justice to initiate an investigation and prosecution of the matter, and declaring the impeachment of President Donald J. Trump by the House of Representatives lacks legitimacy.

119th Congress
Introduced by Rand Paul, Rick Scott,

Urge DOJ to independently investigate the handling of the 2019 Ukraine whistleblower complaint, including potential false statements and redactions.

Submitted in Senate
0
0
Bill Summary • SRES 682

Summary of SRES 682 (119th Congress)

A Senate resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the handling of the 2019 Ukraine whistleblower complaint, directing the Department of Justice to investigate, and asserting the impeachment of President Donald J. Trump lacks legitimacy.

Purpose and intent

  • The resolution asserts that the Senate condemns the handling of the August 2019 Ukraine whistleblower complaint related to President Trump’s July 25, 2019 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
  • It calls for a thorough, independent investigation by the Department of Justice (DOJ) into the handling of that whistleblower complaint, including possible false statements, improper redactions, abuse of the whistleblower process, and coordination with congressional staff.
  • It states that the impeachment of President Trump by the House of Representatives in December 2019 lacked legitimacy, arguing the underlying facts and processes did not meet constitutional standards for “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” or insurrection.

Key provisions and changes

While as a resolution it does not create new law, it includes the following substantive elements:

  1. Condemnation

    • The Senate condemns concealment of material bias information and the use of a flawed complaint to initiate impeachment proceedings against a sitting president.
  2. DOJ investigation

    • Urges the Attorney General to promptly initiate a thorough, independent investigation into the handling of the 2019 Ukraine whistleblower complaint.
    • Areas of inquiry suggested include: potential violations related to false statements, improper redactions, abuse of the whistleblower process, and coordination with congressional staff.
  3. Prosecution and accountability

    • Encourages appropriate criminal prosecutions if warranted by the evidence, in a non-partisan, rule-of-law manner.
  4. Legitimacy of impeachment

    • Declares that the 2019 impeachment of President Trump by the House lacks legitimacy, arguing the Articles of Impeachment were based on flawed procedures and insufficient facts to prove high crimes or insurrection.
  5. Commendation

    • Commends DNI Tulsi Gabbard for declassification and disclosure of materials, praising transparency and accountability.

Who/what is affected

  • Primarily a statement of the Senate’s position and policy guidance to executive and investigative branches.
  • Directly affects perceptions of oversight and potential political accountability related to the 2019 impeachment process.
  • Potentially influences DOJ consideration of pursuing investigations or prosecutions related to the handling of the whistleblower complaint, though the resolution itself does not authorize new investigations beyond urging one.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduced in the Senate on April 20, 2026 by Sen. Scott (R-FL).
  • Co-sponsors: Sen. Rick Scott and Sen. Rand Paul.
  • Referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee for consideration.
  • Status as of the text: referred to committee; no further legislative text or amendments provided in the resolution excerpt.
  • Timing references within the resolution center on events surrounding the 2019 whistleblower complaint and the December 18, 2019 impeachment, contrasted with a 2026 declassification and new Senate action.

Notes

  • This is a non-binding sense-of-the-Senate resolution rather than enacted law.
  • It reflects partisan views about the integrity of the impeachment process and suggests a pathway for DOJ oversight and potential prosecutions, independent of impeachment proceedings.

Hi! I'm your AI assistant for SRES 682. I can help you understand its provisions, impacts, and answer any questions.

Key Provisions Impacts Timeline
Sign in to chat