WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SJRES 142

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Credit Union Administration relating to "Withdrawal of Fee Reporting Requirements".

119th Congress Introduced by Richard Blumenthal and 2 co-sponsors

Senate bill blocks NCUA rule eliminating credit union fee reporting requirements, restoring mandatory transparency on member charges.

Introduced in Senate
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SJRES 142

Legislative bill overview

This joint resolution seeks to block a National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) rule that eliminates fee reporting requirements for credit unions. The resolution uses the Congressional Review Act (CRA), a legislative tool that allows Congress to disapprove and overturn federal agency regulations with a simple majority vote. If passed, the rule would be invalidated and the NCUA would be prohibited from issuing substantially similar rules without new congressional authorization.

Why is this important

Credit union fee transparency directly affects millions of consumers who use credit unions for banking services. The NCUA rule change would reduce the amount of fee information credit unions must publicly disclose, potentially making it harder for consumers and policymakers to compare costs across institutions and monitor industry practices. The outcome influences both consumer protection standards and regulatory burden on financial institutions.

Potential points of contention

  • Consumer transparency vs. regulatory burden: Opponents of the disapproval argue fee reporting creates compliance costs for credit unions; supporters contend transparency is essential for consumer protection and market competition
  • Scope of CRA authority: Debate over whether Congress should routinely use the CRA to overturn agency decisions versus allowing agencies discretion in rule-making
  • Credit union industry impact: Credit unions argue reporting requirements are duplicative; consumer advocates worry elimination weakens oversight of member pricing practices

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.