WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SCR 4023

A concurrent resolution to repeal section 10 of article X of the Constitution of North Dakota, relating to the statewide property tax levy of one mill for support of the state medical center at the University of North Dakota; and to provide an effective date.

69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26) Introduced by Larry Luick

Overview: SCR 4023 - A concurrent resolution to repeal section 10 of article X of the Constitution of North Dakota, relating to the statewide property tax levy of one mill for supp

Second reading, failed to adopt yeas 21 nays 26
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SCR 4023

Overview: SCR 4023 - A concurrent resolution to repeal section 10 of article X of the Constitution of North Dakota, relating to the statewide property tax levy of one mill for support of the state medical center at the University of North Dakota. The resolution failed to be adopted, with a vote of 21 yeas and 26 nays.
Purpose and Intent: The purpose of this concurrent resolution was to repeal the constitutional provision that imposes a statewide property tax levy of one mill to support the state medical center at the University of North Dakota. The intent was to eliminate this dedicated funding source and potentially allow for alternative funding mechanisms or budgetary decisions.
Key Provisions:
- Repeals section 10 of article X of the North Dakota Constitution, which mandates a one-mill statewide property tax levy for the state medical center
- Removes the constitutional requirement for this dedicated funding source
Affected Parties and Impacts: The repeal of the one-mill property tax levy would have impacted the funding and operations of the state medical center at the University of North Dakota. It could have led to changes in how the medical center is financed and supported.
Procedural and Timeline Considerations: The concurrent resolution, SCR 4023, was introduced and considered by the North Dakota legislature. However, it failed to be adopted, with a vote of 21 yeas and 26 nays. The resolution did not move forward, and the constitutional provision remains in effect.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.