Bill

S 4586

Blocking CCP Spy Tech Act of 2026

119th Congress Introduced by Jim Banks and 3 co-sponsors

The bill requires a formal national security review of foreign-produced communications equipment and services, with possible mitigations or bans based on risk.

Introduced in Senate

WeVote Research Nonpartisan

Bill Summary · S 4586

Bill Summary: S. 4586 (119th Congress) – National Security Review of Communications Equipment and Services

Purpose and intent

S. 4586 seeks to require a formal review of the national security risk posed by communications equipment and services produced or provided by certain entities.
The overarching aim is to assess whether specific foreign-produced or foreign-provided communications technologies and services threaten U.S. national security, and to act on findings to mitigate or remove those risks.

Key provisions and changes (highlights)

National security review requirement: Mandates a structured assessment process to evaluate the risk profile of communications equipment and services associated with particular entities. The review is intended to identify security vulnerabilities, influence on critical communications infrastructure, and potential exploitation threats.
Scope of covered entities and products: The bill targets communications equipment and services supplied by identified entities (likely referring to foreign or high-risk providers). It may cover hardware, software, and related services used in communications networks, consumer devices, and critical infrastructure.
Risk criteria and metrics: Establishes criteria for evaluating risk, which may include factors such as supply chain integrity, potential for state influence or interference, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and impact on national security interests.
Consultation and coordination: Requires coordination among relevant federal agencies, notably intelligence and homeland/security departments, to conduct the review and share pertinent information.
Recommendations and actions: Based on the review, the bill would authorize or require measures to address identified risks. This could include restrictions, disabling or replacing equipment, enhanced security controls, or other mitigations.
Reporting requirements: Likely requires a formal report detailing findings, risk assessments, and recommended remedial actions, to be submitted to Congress and potentially public disclosure to the extent allowed by law.
Timeline considerations: The bill would set a schedule for completing the review and implementing any authorized actions, with possible milestones for interim findings and final recommendations.

Who would be affected

Entities providing or producing covered equipment/services: Foreign or high-risk manufacturers and service providers supplying telecommunications hardware, software, and related services used in the U.S. communications ecosystem.
U.S. government agencies: Intelligence, homeland security, commerce, and other federal bodies involved in national security reviews and oversight of communications infrastructure.
Critical infrastructure operators: Public and private sector entities relying on affected equipment/services may face implementation of mitigations or replacements.

Procedural and timeline aspects

Introduced and referred: The bill was introduced in the Senate and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence on May 20, 2026.
Next steps in process: For passage, the bill would typically undergo committee consideration, possible amendments, and votes in the Senate. If advanced, it could move to the House or be part of broader national security legislative packages.
Potential implementation timeline: Once enacted, the review process would be administered according to the bill’s specified schedule, with phased assessments, interim findings, and a final action plan.