WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 4508

A bill to prohibit the sharing of certain information about Federal law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced by Marsha Blackburn and 6 co-sponsors

The bill prohibits sharing or disseminating certain information about federal law enforcement officers to protect their safety.

Introduced in Senate
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 4508

Summary of Bill: S. 4508 (Session 119) – “A bill to prohibit the sharing of certain information about Federal law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.”

Purpose and intent

  • The primary aim of S. 4508 is to restrict the sharing or dissemination of specific information about federal law enforcement officers. The bill seeks to limit how information related to these officers can be disclosed by various parties, with the stated goal of protecting officers and potentially reducing risks that could arise from disclosure.

Key provisions and changes (as conceptualized from the title and typical legislative structure)

  • Prohibition on sharing information: The bill would establish prohibitions or stringent restrictions on the sharing, dissemination, or publication of certain details about federal law enforcement officers. This could include details such as home addresses, personal contact information, or other data that could be used to identify or target officers.
  • Scope of information: The “certain information” covered by the prohibition would be defined within the bill. While the exact list is not provided in the summary, typical provisions may cover personally identifiable information, locations, schedules, or other sensitive data related to officers.
  • Enforcement and penalties: The bill is likely to outline enforcement mechanisms and potential penalties for violations of the information-sharing prohibitions. This could include civil or criminal penalties, compliance requirements for entities that handle such information, and avenues for enforcement.
  • Federal focus: The provisions would apply to information concerning federal law enforcement officers, potentially including officers from federal agencies, and may cover information holders such as media outlets, private entities, or government departments that handle officer data.

Who/what would be affected

  • Federal law enforcement officers: The primary subjects of protection, whose identifying information would be restricted from disclosure.
  • Entities that handle or disseminate information: News organizations, journalists, researchers, advocacy groups, private companies, and possibly federal, state, or local agencies that process or publish officer-related information.
  • Potentially affected behavior: Media reporting practices, data-sharing policies, public records requests, and any public or private databases that contain officer information.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduction and action: The bill was introduced in the Senate and assigned to the Judiciary Committee.
  • Recent actions: On May 13, 2026, the bill was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. This indicates the bill is at or near the initial committee review stage and has not yet advanced to full Senate consideration or passage.
  • Sponsors: The bill has multiple co-sponsors, including Senators Tommy Tuberville, Rick Scott, Mike Lee, James Lankford, Ted Budd, Mike Rounds, and Marsha Blackburn, signaling bipartisan or cross-ideological support among certain members.

Potential implications and considerations

  • Public access vs. safety: The bill foregrounds officer safety by limiting access to sensitive information, but may raise questions about balancing transparency, press freedom, and public oversight.
  • Implementation details: The effectiveness depends on how “certain information” is defined and how broadly the prohibitions extend to various data-sharing platforms, databases, and publication channels.
  • Compliance burden: Entities that handle or publish information about federal officers may need to adjust data-handling practices, privacy protections, and publication policies to avoid penalties.

Note: The summary above is based on the bill’s title, sponsor information, and standard legislative wording. For precise language, definitions, penalties, exemptions, and the full scope of prohibitions, the bill’s text and committee reports should be consulted once available.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.