WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 4278

A bill to prohibit funding for the Board of Peace that is not authorized by Congress, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced by Mark Kelly

The bill bars any funding for the Board of Peace unless Congress explicitly authorizes it.

Introduced in Senate
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 4278

Summary of Bill: S. 4278 (119th Congress)

Title

A bill to prohibit funding for the Board of Peace that is not authorized by Congress, and for other purposes.

Purpose and Intent

  • The bill aims to restrict and condition federal funding related to a body referred to as the “Board of Peace,” ensuring that any funding for this entity (or its activities) is explicitly authorized by Congress.
  • By prohibiting funding that is not Congress-authorized, the bill seeks greater congressional oversight and control over expenditures associated with the Board of Peace.

Key Provisions and Changes (as described in the bill’s title and summary)

  • Funding Authorization Requirement: Prohibits federal funding for the Board of Peace unless such funding is specifically authorized by Congress. This creates a gatekeeping mechanism to ensure appropriations align with enacted authorizations.
  • Scope of Prohibition: The prohibition appears to apply to funding related to the Board of Peace, which could cover salaries, programs, operations, grants, contracts, or any other expenditures tied to the board.
  • “Other Purposes” Clause: As with many related bills, the “and for other purposes” language typically authorizes Congress to include additional related provisions or changes in law necessary to implement or complement the main funding restriction.

Note: The bill text is not provided here, so the exact definitional scope (e.g., what counts as funding, whether it includes certain indirect or off-budget expenditures, how it treats ongoing programs, etc.) is not specified in this summary.

Who/What Would Be Affected

  • The Board of Peace: The primary entity directly targeted by the funding prohibition.
  • Federal Agencies and Programs: Any agency that would previously fund the Board of Peace, including grants, contracts, or other disbursements, would be constrained unless Congress has enacted explicit authorization.
  • Congress (Appropriations/Authorization Process): The bill would place a premium on congressional authorization, potentially altering budgeting dynamics and timelines for related activities.

Procedural/Timeline Details

  • Introduced: 2026-04-13
  • Read Twice and Referred: 2026-04-13
  • Committee: Senate Committee on Foreign Relations (referenced as the committee of jurisdiction)
  • Next Steps: If advanced, the bill would undergo hearings, potential amendments, and a committee vote before possibly progressing to the full Senate for consideration. If passed, it would move to the House (and then to the President for signature or veto).

Sponsor Information

  • Co-sponsor: Senator Mark Kelly

Practical Implications

  • The bill would likely slow or halt any unapproved funding for the Board of Peace, requiring explicit Congressional authorization before any related expenditures could be disbursed.
  • It could require the Board of Peace to operate within the confines of authorized appropriations, potentially affecting programs, personnel, and initiatives unless Congress acts to authorize funding.

If you can provide the bill text or a more detailed summary, I can refine the provisions, definitions, and potential fiscal impacts more precisely.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.