WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 4859

Pell Grant Preservation and Expansion Act of 2026

119th Congress Introduced by Tammy Baldwin and 24 co-sponsors

The bill aims to reform the Federal Pell Grant program to improve its structure, increasing accessibility, predictability, and sustainability for eligible low- and moderate-income

Introduced in Senate
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 4859

Overview

S. 4859, introduced in the 119th Congress, seeks to improve the structure of the Federal Pell Grant program and address related elements of federal student financial aid. The bill is currently read twice and referred to the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. It has a broad bipartisan set of co-sponsors.

Purpose and intent

  • The primary aim is to reform and strengthen the Federal Pell Grant program. The specifics are not provided in the summary, but the bill is described as focusing on “improving the structure” of Pell Grants, which typically involves changes to eligibility, award amounts, funding mechanisms, duration, or program administration.
  • The measures are expected to enhance access to need-based financial aid for eligible low- and moderate-income undergraduate students and to ensure the program is more predictable, sustainable, and aligned with current higher education costs.

Key provisions and changes (as implied)

Note: The exact text of provisions is not included in the provided summary. Based on the stated purpose (“improve the structure of the Federal Pell Grant program”), potential areas the bill might address commonly seen in Pell reforms include:

  • Eligibility criteria adjustments (e.g., updating dependency status rules, citizenship/fulfillment of FAFSA requirements).
  • Calculation and adequacy of Pell Grant awards to reflect tuition, fees, and living costs.
  • Funding guarantees or budgetary mechanisms to stabilize annual award funding.
  • Simplification or modernization of application and administration processes.
  • Compatibility with other student aid programs to reduce borrowing costs and protect Pell eligibility in mixed aid scenarios.
  • Provisions for program integrity, fraud prevention, and data reporting to oversight bodies.
  • Provisions that may impact duration of Pell eligibility (e.g., lifetime eligibility used, annual eligibility refresh).

Because the bill’s text is not provided, the exact substantive changes cannot be enumerated here. The stated intent is to “improve the structure,” which commonly translates to reforms intended to increase accessibility, predictability, or sustainability of the Pell program.

Who would be affected

  • Primary beneficiaries: Undergraduate students who receive or would be eligible for Pell Grants, especially those from low- and moderate-income families.
  • Other impacted groups: Higher education institutions (which administer Pell-related processes), state higher education systems, and federal offices responsible for student aid administration.
  • Stakeholders in higher education financing, including advocacy groups, lenders, and policymakers, may be influenced by changes to eligibility rules, award amounts, or application processes.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Status: Introduced in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
  • Action history indicates: Read twice; committee referral (as of 2026-06-23).
  • Possible next steps if advanced: Committee hearings, markup, and potential floor consideration in the Senate; thereafter, possible reconciliation with a companion bill in the House or passage to the President, depending on timing and legislative strategy.

Why this matters

  • Pell Grants are a cornerstone of federal need-based aid for low-income college students. Structural improvements can:
    • Increase grant adequacy relative to rising college costs.
    • Improve stability and predictability of aid year to year.
    • Reduce reliance on student loans, potentially lowering debt burdens.
    • Simplify administration for institutions and applicants.

Notes for readers

  • The summary above reflects the bill’s stated objective and available action history. For precise provisions, a line-by-line reading of the bill text and any analysis from the Committee or Congressional Research Service would be required.
  • Co-sponsors span a broad range of Senate Democrats, indicating cross-cutting support for Pell reform goals.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.