WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 4787

FEAT Act

119th Congress Introduced by John Barrasso and 5 co-sponsors

S. 4787 aims to speed up DOI administrative proceedings to reduce backlogs and shorten timelines, improving efficiency and predictability in decisions.

Introduced in Senate
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 4787

Summary of Bill: S. 4787 (119th Congress)

Purpose and intent

S. 4787 aims to speed up the resolution of certain administrative proceedings within the Department of the Interior (DOI) and to address related administrative processes. The bill’s central objective is to reduce backlogs and shorten timelines in specific internal adjudicatory or review procedures at DOI, potentially improving decision-making efficiency and predictability for affected parties.

Key provisions and changes

  • Expedite Administrative Proceedings: The bill establishes or expands mechanisms to accelerate certain administrative actions under DOI jurisdiction. This could involve streamlined review schedules, prioritized docket handling, or limited procedural steps that delay final determinations.
  • Procedural Reforms: Provisions may modify or clarify rules governing how cases move through DOI administrative channels, including deadlines, filing requirements, and potential use of expedited processes in particular categories of matters (e.g., permits, allocations, resource determinations, or enforcement-related proceedings).
  • Coordination and Oversight: The measure could set up enhanced coordination within DOI offices or with affected program offices to ensure faster processing, including potential reporting requirements or oversight to ensure compliance with expedited timelines.
  • Interagency or Stakeholder Impacts: The bill may address how expedited proceedings interact with other federal processes, judicial review timelines, and relationships with affected stakeholders, including tribal, state, or private entities, depending on the specific administrative areas covered by DOI.

Who or what would be affected

  • Department of the Interior programs and administrative proceedings within its purview (e.g., Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, National Park Service, and related DOI offices).
  • Entities subject to DOI decisions or permits, such as individuals, corporations, utilities, landowners, developers, conservation groups, and potentially tribal entities, depending on the case type.
  • DOI staff and program offices responsible for processing administrative actions, as timelines and procedures are redefined or accelerated.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduction and Referral: The bill was introduced in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources for consideration.
  • Status: As of the latest action, it has been read twice and referred to the committee (June 15, 2026).
  • Potential Timeline Changes: If enacted, stages for filing, review, hearings, and final determinations could include shorter statutory or regulatory deadlines, specified expedited paths, and tighter schedules for administrative decisions.

Sponsors and support

  • Primary co-sponsors include notable Senate Republicans: Rick Scott, Mike Lee, John Barrasso, Tom Cotton, and Cynthia Lummis.
  • The bipartisan group of sponsors signals support for improving the pace of administrative resolutions within DOI, though the specifics of the expedited mechanisms would be clarified in committee and floor amendments.

Additional notes

  • The exact substantive text of S. 4787 is not provided here. The summary reflects the bill’s title and stated purpose to expedite administrative proceedings at the Department of the Interior and to address related matters. For a complete understanding, one would review the bill’s full text, sponsor statements, committee reports, and any amendments considered during the Energy and Natural Resources Committee process.
  • Possible considerations for readers: expedited procedures can raise questions about due process, the balance between efficiency and thorough review, and potential impacts on stakeholders’ ability to participate in hearings or provide input.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.