WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 4843

A bill to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to promote comprehensive campus mental health and suicide prevention plans, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced by Michael Bennet and 2 co-sponsors

The bill would require colleges to implement comprehensive, data-driven campus mental health and suicide prevention plans, funded and evaluated with federal support.

Introduced in Senate
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 4843

Overview

S. 4843, introduced in the 119th Congress, seeks to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to strengthen and expand campus-based mental health services and suicide prevention efforts at institutions of higher education. The bill aims to establish nationwide requirements and funding mechanisms to promote comprehensive mental health planning, prevention, and response on college and university campuses.

Purpose and Intent

  • Improve students’ mental health and well-being by mandating standardized, campus-wide mental health and suicide prevention planning.
  • Ensure higher education institutions adopt proactive, data-driven approaches to identify at-risk students and provide timely support.
  • Promote collaboration among campus health services, counseling centers, faculty, staff, students, and community partners.
  • Increase federal attention and resources dedicated to campus mental health infrastructure and crisis response.

Key Provisions and Changes

  • Comprehensive Campus Plans: The bill would require institutions to develop, implement, and periodically update comprehensive mental health and suicide prevention plans as a condition tied to eligibility for certain federal programs or funding streams.
  • Prevention and Promotion: Emphasis on preventive measures, mental health literacy, stigma reduction, and early identification of students who may be at risk.
  • Crisis Response and Safety Protocols: Establish standardized safety protocols for suicidality, crisis intervention, and coordinated emergency responses within campus communities.
  • Collaboration and Training: Mandates cross-disciplinary training for faculty, staff, and administrators to recognize warning signs, refer students to appropriate services, and connect families with resources.
  • Data, Evaluation, and Accountability: Requirements for data collection, program evaluation, and reporting to monitor outcomes and demonstrate effectiveness of campus mental health initiatives.
  • Funding and Grant Programs: Provision of federal funding streams (grants or appropriations) to support implementation, staffing, training, and program expansion at eligible institutions.
  • Equitable Access: Provisions to address disparities in access to mental health services, with attention to underrepresented or underserved student populations.
  • Coordination with Other Programs: Alignment with existing Higher Education Act provisions, Department of Education guidelines, and relevant federal mental health initiatives.

Who/What Would Be Affected

  • Institutions of Higher Education: Colleges and universities (including public, private, and nonprofit institutions) participating in federal programs related to higher education and student services.
  • Students: Undergraduate and graduate students who would benefit from expanded counseling, crisis intervention, and mental health resources.
  • Campus Mental Health Providers: On-campus counseling centers, health services, and affiliated professionals who would implement plans and participate in training.
  • Campus Administrators and Staff: Deans, student affairs officials, faculty, and support staff involved in mental health promotion and crisis response.
  • Federal Programs and Agencies: The U.S. Department of Education and related federal funding authorities would administer new grant programs and compliance requirements.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduction and Referral: Bill introduced and referred to the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) for consideration.
  • Committee Process: As with typical federal legislation, the committee would review, hold hearings, possibly amend, and vote to report the bill to the full Senate.
  • Implementation Timeline: If enacted, institutions would receive a defined period to develop and implement the required mental health plans and participate in federal funding programs. Specific phased timelines (e.g., compliance deadlines, reporting dates) would be outlined in the final enacted text.
  • Funding Timeline: Any new federal funding or grant programs would have appropriation timelines and application windows established by statute and subsequent appropriations actions.

Potential Impact

  • Enhanced capacity of higher education institutions to address student mental health needs and reduce suicide risk.
  • Greater standardization of mental health planning across campuses, facilitating better oversight and accountability.
  • Increased federal funding to expand access to mental health services, particularly for underserved student populations.
  • Improved data collection and program evaluation to inform best practices in campus mental health.

Note: The above summary reflects the bill’s stated structure and typical features of Higher Education Act amendments focused on campus mental health and suicide prevention. For precise language, section-by-section provisions, and final regulatory implications, refer to the bill’s official text and any enacted amendments.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.