WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 2192

A BILL for an Act to provide an appropriation to the department of health and human services for accreditation grants for community providers.

69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26) Introduced by Kathy Hogan and 4 co-sponsors

North Dakota would provide a one-time $240,000 general-fund grant to DHHS to reimburse community providers serving people with disabilities for accreditation costs (2025–27).

Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 13 nays 31
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 2192

Bill Summary — SB 2192

At a glance

  • Title (as provided): An Act to provide an appropriation to the Department of Health and Human Services for accreditation grants for community providers.
  • Primary substantive provision (North Dakota text): Appropriates $240,000 from the general fund to the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) to provide grants reimbursing community providers that serve individuals with disabilities for costs of obtaining and maintaining accreditation standards required by the department for the 2025–2027 biennium (July 1, 2025–June 30, 2027).
  • Fiscal amount: $240,000 (or so much as may be necessary).
  • Sponsor(s) / authors: North Dakota version lists Senators Lee, Hogan, Sorvaag and Representatives Mitskog, Nelson, Pyle. An unrelated Illinois SB2192 version is sponsored by Sen. Julie A. Morrison.
  • Procedural note: The provided records include mixed actions for two different bills labeled SB 2192 (North Dakota appropriation language and an Illinois “Preventing Targeted Violence Act”). The documents indicate the bill did not advance to enactment (failed passage or died in committee in the provided histories).

Purpose and intent

The North Dakota text aims to reduce the financial burden on community-based providers who must meet accreditation standards required by DHHS to serve individuals with disabilities. By reimbursing accreditation and maintenance costs, the appropriation is intended to support provider compliance and continuity of services.

Key provisions (North Dakota text)

  • One-time appropriation: $240,000 from the general fund for the 2025–2027 biennium.
  • Use of funds: Grants administered by DHHS to reimburse community providers serving individuals with disabilities for costs of obtaining and maintaining accreditation required by the department.
  • No additional programmatic details (eligibility criteria, grant application process, per-provider caps, or reporting requirements) are specified in the text provided.

Who would be affected

  • Primary recipients: Community providers that serve individuals with disabilities and that are required by DHHS to obtain/maintain accreditation.
  • State agency: Department of Health and Human Services—responsible for administering reimbursement grants.
  • Fiscal impact: $240,000 charge to the state general fund for the specified biennium.

Procedural status & timeline (from provided records)

  • North Dakota documents: Introduced and went through committee/engrossment language; some entries indicate committee adoption (Human Services Committee) and first/first engrossed versions. Another record says “Died In Committee” (3/4/2025).
  • Illinois documents (different SB2192): Contains a full draft of a distinct “Preventing Targeted Violence Act” (community support teams) and shows legislative activity including readings and a failed second-reading vote (failed to pass, yeas 13 nays 31 on 2/14/2025).
  • Net outcome in provided materials: No enacted law for the appropriation text appears in the supplied records; the dossier contains mixed, state-specific materials for two separate SB 2192 bills.

Notes and caveats

  • The packet you provided includes two different SB 2192 texts from different states. The appropriation to DHHS for accreditation grants is the North Dakota version; the longer community support team / Preventing Targeted Violence text is an Illinois bill and is a separate measure with different sponsors and policy goals.
  • The appropriation bill text is brief and lacks implementing details (grant rules, award limits, audit/reporting requirements). If you want a draft of likely implementation language or a summary focused only on one state’s bill, tell me which state/version to prioritize and I can expand.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.