WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 616

A bill for an act relating to the rights and obligations of certain state and local government entities in erecting, rebuilding, or repairing partition fences, including the allocation of moneys from accounts in the Iowa resources enhancement and protection fund.

2025-2026 Regular Session

Public land managers (DNR and county conservation boards) have the same partition fence rights, duties, and cost-sharing as private landowners, funded via REAP accounts.

Message from Senate.
#accounts #agriculturalland #boundaries(property) #conservationboards #executivebranch #fences #iowaresourcesenhancementandprotectionprogram #localgovernment #money #naturalresources #naturalresourcesdepartment #partition #realproperty #rights
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 616

SF 616 Summary

A bill relating to the rights and obligations of state and local government entities in erecting, rebuilding, or repairing partition fences, including how money from REAP accounts may be used.

Overview

  • Bill Number: SF 616
  • Title: A bill for an act relating to the rights and obligations of certain state and local government entities in erecting, rebuilding, or repairing partition fences, including the allocation of moneys from accounts in the Iowa resources enhancement and protection fund (REAP).
  • Primary focus: Aligning the duties of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and county conservation boards with private landowners in partition fence matters, and clarifying funding sources from REAP accounts for such activities.
  • Status: Passed Senate (yea 48, nays 0) and moved as of April 30, 2025 with an immediate message.
  • Introduced: March 25, 2025
  • Procedural notes: Introduced and placed on Appropriations calendar; committee reported; subsequent Senate action in April 2025.

What the bill does

  • Extends to DNR and county conservation boards the same rights and obligations as private landowners under Iowa’s partition fence law (Code chapter 359A) for erecting and maintaining partition fences.
  • After fence viewers issue an order assigning responsibility for fence costs, both parties (the government entity and the adjacent private landowner) must deposit with the fence viewers amounts covering their respective share of the costs plus the viewers’ expenses.
  • DNR and county boards may fund their contributions from specific REAP accounts:
    • DNR contributions may come from REAP’s Open Spaces Account.
    • County conservation board contributions may come from REAP’s County Conservation Account.

Key provisions and mechanisms

  • The bill formalizes that public land managers have the same fencing responsibilities and cost-recovery mechanisms as private landowners.
  • It preserves the role of fence viewers and the adjudication process under Code Chapter 359A, including the requirement to deposit funds after an order is issued.
  • Funding flexibility is introduced by allowing applicable REAP accounts to cover the government entities’ share of fencing costs.
  • The allocations referenced reflect existing REAP distributions:
    • Approximately 28% of REAP funds are allocated to the Open Spaces Account (supports DNR programs, including land acquisition).
    • Approximately 30% of REAP funds are allocated to the County Conservation Account (supports county conservation projects).

Affected entities

  • State: Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
  • Local government: County conservation boards
  • Private landowners adjacent to public land boundaries where partition fences are involved

Background context

  • Iowa’s fence law (Code chapter 359A) governs partition fences between neighboring parcels and provides a framework for determining responsibility and cost-sharing through fence viewers.
  • The bill clarifies that DNR and county boards have the same rights and obligations as private landowners in these matters, aligning public entities with existing statutory processes.

Procedural timeline

  • 2025-03-25: Introduced and placed on Appropriations calendar; committee report issued.
  • 2025-03-26 onward: NOBA (not on budget appropriation) steps noted.
  • 2025-04-29: Passed Senate, 48-0; immediate message and related Senate floor actions.
  • 2025-04-30: Message from Senate (status updated).

Potential impact

  • Clarifies funding sources for government-owned fencing actions, potentially affecting budgeting and REAP disbursements.
  • May streamline resolution of partition fence disputes involving public land by incorporating public entities into the private-landowner framework.
  • Could influence county and state program expenditures tied to REAP, particularly for Open Spaces and County Conservation accounts.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.