WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 709

A bill for an act relating to local civil rights agencies and commissions.

2025-2026 Regular Session

HF 709 repeals the 29,000+ city mandate to keep an independent local civil rights agency, shifting civil rights oversight to other state, county, or local structures.

Introduced, referred to Judiciary.
#boards #commissions #andcouncils #civilrights
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 709

Summary of HF 709 (Introduced March 3, 2025)

Overview

HF 709 is a bill in the legislature that addresses the structure of local civil rights governance. It was introduced on March 3, 2025 and referred to the Judiciary committee. The bill focuses on the statutory requirement for certain cities to maintain an independent local civil rights agency or commission.

What the bill would do

  • Repeal the requirement that a city with a population of 29,000 or greater must maintain an independent local civil rights agency or commission.
  • This change is effected by “amending Section 216.19, subsection 2, Code 2025 by striking the subsection.” In other words, the specific subsection that currently mandates an independent local civil rights agency for larger cities would be removed.

Key provisions

  • Section 1 indicates the change targets Section 216.19, subsection 2 of the 2025 Code.
  • The introduced version includes only this amendment and does not list additional substantive changes beyond striking the subsection.
  • There is no explicit effective date within the text provided for HF 709.

Who would be affected

  • Cities in the state with populations of 29,000 or more that are currently required by law to maintain an independent local civil rights agency or commission.
  • Local governments and the mechanisms they use for civil rights enforcement at the municipal level.

Potential impacts

  • Local governments would no longer be obligated to maintain an independent local civil rights agency solely due to population size 29,000+. They may rely on other structures (e.g., state-level processes, county arrangements, or different local governance models) for civil rights enforcement and related functions.
  • The change could affect local governance and administrative budgeting related to civil rights compliance and oversight.
  • The bill’s introduction suggests a shift away from mandatory independent local civil rights bodies for larger cities, though the specific operational implications would depend on subsequent statutory rules or local practices that respond to this repeal.

Procedural timeline and status

  • Introduction: March 3, 2025
  • Current status: Introduced and referred to Judiciary
  • Next steps (if pursued): The bill would typically proceed to Judiciary committee hearings, possible amendments, and then floor consideration, subject to legislative scheduling and voting outcomes.

Note: The introduced text provides limited detail beyond the repealing of the subsection; no accompanying fiscal note or additional provisions are included in the version provided.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.