WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HSB 259

A bill for an act relating to judicial branch administration, including judicial officer residency, remote proceedings, court reporter supervision and duties, and civil pleadings availability.

2025-2026 Regular Session

Expands residency requirements for district judges, magistrates, and full-time juvenile and probate judges, reshaping eligibility and placement.

Committee report approving bill, renumbered as HF 956.
#courtreporters #judgesandcourtofficials #judicialbranch #pleadings
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HSB 259

Summary: HSB 259 (renumbered as HF 956) — Judicial Branch Administration, Residency, Remote Proceedings, Court Reporters, and Civil Pleadings Availability

Overview

HSB 259, introduced February 26, 2025, seeks to reform certain judicial branch administration topics, including judicial officer residency, the use of remote proceedings, supervision and duties of court reporters, and the availability of civil pleadings. The bill was approved by a committee and renumbered as HF 956. The enacted version will provide specific governance and oversight changes for judicial officers and court reporters, with potential impacts on scheduling, accountability, and access to civil pleadings.

Key Provisions

Division I – Judicial Officer Residency

  • Expands the residency requirement for judges beyond the current district of election to include a county contiguous with the judicial election district of appointment.
  • Applies the new residency requirement to:
    • District associate judges
    • Magistrates
    • Full-time associate juvenile judges
    • Full-time associate probate judges
  • Repeals a Code section related to a 1984–1985 transition residency requirement for election districts 5A and 5C.

Division II – Miscellaneous Judicial Administration

  • Remote Proceedings
    • Authorizes court proceedings to be held by remote means of communication.
  • Court Reporter Appointment and Supervision
    • Reforms appointment processes: chief judge or the chief judge’s designee has authority to supervise, schedule, and assign duties of all court reporters within the judicial district.
    • A judge presiding over a reported proceeding may supervise the court reporter’s work for that matter.
    • The chief judge may delegate appointment, supervision, and duties of court reporters to the district court administrator or the district court administrator’s designee.
    • Judicial officers must appoint a court reporter within the district, subject to approval by the chief judge of the judicial district.

Note: The bill’s title also includes civil pleadings availability, but the provided text does not specify detailed provisions on civil pleadings. The substantive provisions described above are the ones detailed in the introduced version.

Affected Entities

  • Judicial officers (district judges, district associate judges, magistrates, juvenile and probate judges)
  • Court reporters (appointment, supervision, scheduling, and duties)
  • District court administrators and district administrators’ designees
  • Parties and participants in court proceedings (potentially affected by remote proceedings and unified reporter oversight)
  • Public access to civil pleadings (pending details in the final bill)

Timeline and Status

  • Introduced: February 26, 2025 (Judiciary committee referral)
  • Subcommittee: February 26–March 3, 2025 (Lohse, Lawler, Olson)
  • Subcommittee meeting: March 4, 2025
  • Committee action: March 4, 2025 (recommended passage)
  • Committee action: March 6, 2025 (amendment and passage; Vote: Yeas 21, Nays 0)
  • Committee report: March 12, 2025 (approved, renumbered HF 956)

Practical Impact

  • Clarifies and broadens residency requirements for several judicial officers, potentially affecting eligibility and placement.
  • Centralizes oversight of court reporters at the district level, with flexibility to delegate to the district court administrator, which could streamline scheduling and supervision.
  • Supports the use of remote proceedings, expanding accessibility and modernization of court operations.
  • The final form may include or clarify provisions on civil pleadings availability; consult the enacted HF 956 for complete details.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.