WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HSB 776

A bill for an act relating to and making appropriations to the judicial branch.

2025-2026 Regular Session

The bill centralizes and standardizes how state funds are distributed to Iowa judicial districts for court-ordered services, prioritizing state funding and inter-district transfers

Committee report approving bill, renumbered as HF 2769.
#appropriations #judicialbranch
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HSB 776

Bill Summary — Iowa HSB 776 (2025-2026)

Note: This summary focuses on the substantive provisions related to appropriations for the judicial branch, as reflected in the bill text presented and the action history.

1) Purpose and Intent

  • The bill pertains to appropriations for the judicial branch in Iowa and provides specific guidance on how funds are distributed to judicial districts, as well as constraints on funding for certain court-ordered services and administration.
  • It directs the state court administrator to determine distribution amounts to the judicial districts within a defined timeline tied to the release of annual census data.
  • The overarching aim appears to be ensuring predictable funding flows to districts and controlling expenditures related to court-ordered services and interstate juvenile commitments.

2) Key Provisions and Changes

  • Distribution of Funds to Judicial Districts

    • The bill authorizes the state court administrator to determine, within 30 days after the annual census data is released, how certain appropriated funds are distributed to the judicial districts.
    • It supersedes or modifies other laws to the extent necessary to implement this distribution approach.

  • Court-Ordered Services and State Funding

    • District or juvenile courts may not order any service that is a charge upon the state under section 232.141 if there are insufficient court-ordered services funds available in the district’s distribution amount.
    • The Chief Juvenile Court Officer is tasked with encouraging the use of funds appropriated under this provision to ensure there are sufficient dollars to pay for all court-ordered services during the fiscal year.
    • The Chief Juvenile Court Officer must anticipate potential surpluses or shortfalls in distribution amounts and may request transfers of funds between judicial districts to maintain prudent levels of funding.

  • County Responsibility for Juvenile Services

    • A district or juvenile court cannot order a county to pay for any service provided to a juvenile pursuant to a chapter 232 order if that service is charged to the state under section 232.141, subsection 4.
    • This reinforces that certain juvenile court services remain state-funded rather than county-funded.

  • Administrative Cap

    • Of the funds appropriated in the designated paragraph, no more than $83,000 may be used by the judicial branch for administration related to implementing these requirements.

  • Interstate Compact on Juveniles

    • A specified portion of funds may be allocated to cover the actual cost of the annual membership fee for the Interstate Commission for Juveniles, aligning with the Interstate Compact for Juveniles, as provided in a referenced section.

3) Who/What Would Be Affected

  • Iowa Judicial Districts and the State Court Administrator

    • Allocation decisions and timing for distributing appropriated funds to districts.
    • Authority to transfer funds between districts if needed to balance surpluses/shortfalls.

  • Chief Juvenile Court Officer

    • Responsibilities to ensure sufficient funds are available for all court-ordered services and to plan for budget fluctuations.

  • Courts (District and Juvenile) and County Governments

    • Limitations on funding certain services to be charged to counties; emphasis remains on state funding for specified court-ordered juvenile services.

  • Interstate Commission for Juveniles

    • A portion of funds may be allocated to cover membership costs, supporting participation in interstate juvenile matters.

4) Procedural and Timeline Elements

  • Distribution Timing

    • The state court administrator must determine distribution amounts within 30 days of the annual census data release.

  • Reallocation and Prudence

    • The bill contemplates proactive monitoring of surpluses/shortfalls and permits inter-district transfers to maintain appropriate funding levels.

  • Administrative Cap

    • A fixed cap of $83,000 on administrative expenditures related to implementing these provisions.

5) Action History (as of the provided record)

  • Introduced and referred to Appropriations (April 13, 2026).
  • Subcommittee consideration and House Subcommittee proceedings occurred on April 13, 2026.
  • Committee reported favorably and renumbered the bill as HF 2769 (April 15, 2026).
  • Committee vote: Yeas 17, Nays 7, Excused 1; recommended passage (April 15, 2026).

6) Practical Implications

  • The bill seeks to centralize and standardize funding allocations to judicial districts, reducing reliance on local discretion for certain court-ordered services.
  • It introduces mechanisms to prevent service funding shortfalls and to optimize the use of state funds across districts through transfers as needed.
  • It places emphasis on state funding for juvenile court services rather than county funding, potentially affecting intergovernmental cost-sharing dynamics.
  • Administrative spending on implementing these provisions is capped, signaling a focus on efficiency and budget control.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.