WeVote

Bill

Bill

HF 115

A bill for an act providing penalties for certain nonimmigrant visa holders attending or employed by certain institutions of higher education who express support for certain terrorist activities or organizations and including effective date provisions.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Taylor Collins and 1 co-sponsor

Iowa bill penalizes nonimmigrant visa holders at colleges who express support for terrorist activities, raising free speech and due process concerns while affecting international enrollment.

Committee report approving bill, renumbered as HF 576.
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 115

Legislative bill overview

HF 115 (renumbered HF 576) would impose penalties on nonimmigrant visa holders at Iowa higher education institutions who express support for terrorist activities or organizations. The bill establishes consequences for such speech, potentially including visa revocation or deportation proceedings, and applies to both students and employees.

Why is this important

This bill directly addresses national security concerns by targeting foreign nationals whose stated positions may pose risks, while simultaneously raising First Amendment and due process questions. It could significantly affect international student recruitment, faculty hiring, and campus speech dynamics at Iowa universities and colleges.

Potential points of contention

  • Free speech vs. security balance: Defining "express support" for terrorist activities is legally complex; the threshold between protected political speech and punishable conduct remains ambiguous and could chill legitimate discourse
  • Due process concerns: Nonimmigrant visa holders may have limited legal protections; procedures for determining violations, appeals, and evidence standards need clarification to avoid arbitrary enforcement
  • International relationships and recruitment: The bill could deter qualified international students and scholars from attending Iowa institutions, affecting institutional competitiveness and research partnerships
  • Definition ambiguity: "Certain terrorist activities or organizations" requires clear legal definition; reliance on executive designations or subjective interpretation could lead to inconsistent application

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.