Bill

BILL • US HOUSE

HR 4237

Stopping Executive Clearance Unfair Revocation Efforts Act

119th Congress
Introduced by Ami Bera, André Carson, Sean Casten and 10 other co-sponsors

The SECURE Act protects executive branch employees from unfair security clearance revocations, ensuring due process and oversight to maintain national security and fairness.

Introduced in House
0
0
Bill Summary • HR 4237

Summary of HR 4237: Stopping Executive Clearance Unfair Revocation Efforts Act (SECURE Act)

Purpose and Intent

The Stopping Executive Clearance Unfair Revocation Efforts Act, commonly referred to as the SECURE Act, aims to address concerns regarding the revocation of security clearances for individuals in the executive branch of government. The bill seeks to establish protections against what its sponsors describe as unfair or arbitrary revocation processes, ensuring that individuals are treated fairly and justly in matters concerning their security clearances.

Key Provisions

While the full text of the bill has not been detailed in the provided information, the following key provisions can be inferred based on the bill's title and intent:

  • Protection Against Unfair Revocation: The bill likely includes measures to prevent the unjust revocation of security clearances, ensuring that any actions taken are based on clear, documented reasons rather than arbitrary or politically motivated decisions.

  • Due Process: The SECURE Act may establish a framework for due process, allowing individuals whose clearances are revoked to appeal the decision and present their case in a fair manner.

  • Oversight Mechanisms: The bill may propose oversight mechanisms to monitor the revocation process and ensure compliance with established guidelines, potentially involving independent review bodies.

Who Would Be Affected

The SECURE Act primarily affects:

  • Executive Branch Employees: Individuals working in various capacities within the executive branch who hold security clearances would benefit from the protections outlined in the bill.

  • Government Agencies: Agencies that manage security clearances would need to adapt their processes to comply with the new regulations established by the SECURE Act.

  • National Security: The bill could have broader implications for national security, as it aims to ensure that qualified individuals retain their clearances and can continue to contribute to government functions without undue fear of revocation.

Legislative Timeline

  • Introduced: June 27, 2025
  • Referred to Committee: The bill was referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on the same day it was introduced.

Sponsors

The SECURE Act is sponsored by a diverse group of lawmakers, indicating a bipartisan interest in the issue. Key sponsors include:

  • Dave Min (Primary Sponsor)
  • Norma J. Torres
  • Suhas Subramanyam
  • Henry C. "Hank" Johnson
  • Pramila Jayapal
  • Ami Bera
  • Jill N. Tokuda
  • Raja Krishnamoorthi
  • Ted Lieu
  • Mike Quigley
  • April McClain Delaney
  • André Carson

Conclusion

The SECURE Act represents an effort to reform the security clearance revocation process within the executive branch, aiming to enhance fairness and transparency. As the bill progresses through the legislative process, further details will likely emerge regarding its specific provisions and potential impacts on government operations and personnel.

Hi! I'm your AI assistant for HR 4237. I can help you understand its provisions, impacts, and answer any questions.

Key Provisions Impacts Timeline
Sign in to chat