Bill

BILL • US HOUSE

HRES 977

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4593) to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to revise the definition of showerhead; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5184) to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from enforcing energy efficiency standards applicable to manufactured housing, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6938) making consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes.

119th Congress
Introduced by Erin Houchin,

House approves debate on bills to relax showerhead efficiency standards, block manufactured housing efficiency rules, and pass 2026 federal spending by narrow 214-212 vote.

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
0
2
Bill Summary • HRES 977

Legislative bill overview

HRES 977 is a procedural resolution that sets the terms for House floor debate and votes on three separate bills: one redefining showerhead water flow standards, one blocking Energy Department enforcement of efficiency rules for manufactured housing, and one providing consolidated fiscal year 2026 appropriations. The resolution passed narrowly along party lines, allowing these substantive measures to proceed to full House consideration.

Why is this important

These bills address regulatory enforcement and federal spending priorities that affect both consumer products and housing construction. The showerhead and manufactured housing efficiency measures represent a shift toward reducing federal regulatory requirements, while the appropriations bill determines federal spending across numerous agencies and programs for the upcoming fiscal year.

Potential points of contention

  • Regulatory rollback vs. conservation: The showerhead redefinition and manufactured housing exemption represent deregulation that proponents see as reducing government overreach but opponents view as rolling back environmental and consumer protections established over decades
  • Narrow procedural margins: The 214-212 vote indicates deep partisan division on whether these bills should receive floor consideration at all, suggesting contentious debate ahead on the substantive measures
  • Bundling strategy: Combining three distinct policy areas in one procedural resolution limits amendments and debate flexibility, a tactic that both parties use but which restricts legislative deliberation on individual issues

Hi! I'm your AI assistant for HRES 977. I can help you understand its provisions, impacts, and answer any questions.

Key Provisions Impacts Timeline
Sign in to chat